Driver told to expect at least six years jail

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:54:10 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:03:15 -0000, John Smith wrote:
Bod wrote:

Consent was given, albeit under deception. How can you be raped when
you consent?

Well first of all, she wasn't 'raped'. Women cannot rape - not in
English law, at least, since rape requires the penetration of the
vagina, mouth or anus by a penis (s. 1(1)(a) Sexual Offences Act 2003).

You really are a ****wit.

LOL ... poor 'Tough Guy' doesn't like it when people know more than he
does. Life as you must be erm.. tough.

What if a woman ties up a man and forces herself onto his erect penis.

What if she does? She has committed sexual assault.

The same sexual intercourse takes place, but the person forcing it is now
the woman.

It is therefore not rape.

I don't make the laws. I just tell you what the law is. In English law, a
woman cannot commit rape.

Rape and sexual assault are synonyms. Get that through your thick head.

That's a keeper.


--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:38:16 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:54:10 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:03:15 -0000, John Smith wrote:
Bod wrote:

Consent was given, albeit under deception. How can you be raped when
you consent?

Well first of all, she wasn't 'raped'. Women cannot rape - not in
English law, at least, since rape requires the penetration of the
vagina, mouth or anus by a penis (s. 1(1)(a) Sexual Offences Act 2003).

You really are a ****wit.

LOL ... poor 'Tough Guy' doesn't like it when people know more than he
does. Life as you must be erm.. tough.

What if a woman ties up a man and forces herself onto his erect penis.

What if she does? She has committed sexual assault.

The same sexual intercourse takes place, but the person forcing it is now
the woman.

It is therefore not rape.

I don't make the laws. I just tell you what the law is. In English law, a
woman cannot commit rape.

Rape and sexual assault are synonyms. Get that through your thick head.

That's a keeper.

From Wikipedia:
Sexual assault is any involuntary sexual act in which a person is coerced or physically forced to engage against their will.
Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration perpetrated against a person without that person's consent.

Identical.

--
The dandelion swayed in the gentle breeze like an oscillating electric fan set on medium.

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:44:58 -0000, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:38:16 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:54:10 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:03:15 -0000, John Smith wrote:
Bod wrote:

Consent was given, albeit under deception. How can you be raped when
you consent?

Well first of all, she wasn't 'raped'. Women cannot rape - not in
English law, at least, since rape requires the penetration of the
vagina, mouth or anus by a penis (s. 1(1)(a) Sexual Offences Act 2003).

You really are a ****wit.

LOL ... poor 'Tough Guy' doesn't like it when people know more than he
does. Life as you must be erm.. tough.

What if a woman ties up a man and forces herself onto his erect penis.

What if she does? She has committed sexual assault.

The same sexual intercourse takes place, but the person forcing it is now
the woman.

It is therefore not rape.

I don't make the laws. I just tell you what the law is. In English law, a
woman cannot commit rape.

Rape and sexual assault are synonyms. Get that through your thick head.

That's a keeper.

From Wikipedia:
Sexual assault is any involuntary sexual act in which a person is coerced or physically forced to engage against their will.
Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration perpetrated against a person without that person's consent.

Identical.

Or for the lower intelligence cyclists among us: Both a "sex when you didn't want it".

--
Do files get embarrassed when they get unzipped?

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

From Wikipedia:

There's your problem.

--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

On 14/11/2015 17:38, John Smith wrote:
Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:54:10 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:03:15 -0000, John Smith wrote:
Bod wrote:

Consent was given, albeit under deception. How can you be raped when
you consent?

Well first of all, she wasn't 'raped'. Women cannot rape - not in
English law, at least, since rape requires the penetration of the
vagina, mouth or anus by a penis (s. 1(1)(a) Sexual Offences Act 2003).

You really are a ****wit.

LOL ... poor 'Tough Guy' doesn't like it when people know more than he
does. Life as you must be erm.. tough.

What if a woman ties up a man and forces herself onto his erect penis.

What if she does? She has committed sexual assault.

The same sexual intercourse takes place, but the person forcing it is now
the woman.

It is therefore not rape.

I don't make the laws. I just tell you what the law is. In English law, a
woman cannot commit rape.

Rape and sexual assault are synonyms. Get that through your thick head.

That's a keeper.


Have you written to Cleveland Police, Middlesbrough and Stockton
councils & Highways England yet?

On 14/11/2015 17:48, John Smith wrote:
Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

From Wikipedia:

There's your problem.

Have you written to Cleveland Police, Middlesbrough and Stockton
councils & Highways England yet?

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:48:36 -0000, John Smith wrote:

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

From Wikipedia:

There's your problem.

It is a widely accepted very reliable source. I'm not surprised a ****wit like you doesn't use it though.

--
"Oh, Jason, take me!" she panted, her breasts heaving like a student on 31p-a-pint night.

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 18:30:07 -0000, David Lang wrote:

On 14/11/2015 17:48, John Smith wrote:
Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

From Wikipedia:

There's your problem.

Have you written to Cleveland Police, Middlesbrough and Stockton
councils & Highways England yet?

Everybody needs to work out a way to set up an autoresponder to ask this. Maybe the liar will get a clue someday.

--
Dijon vu: the same mustard as before.

Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 17:48:36 -0000, John Smith wrote:
Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

From Wikipedia:

There's your problem.

I'm not surprised a ****wit like you doesn't use it though.

Oh, but of course you're 'not surprised'. Like others of your class, you
consider that the great 'democratization' that has come with the Internet,
means that your ignorance is equivalent to my knowledge. That, plus an
unhealthy (and unwarranted) dose of superiority complex, means that you
don't see the absurdity in arguing the law with the holder of a law degree.

But whatever. Carry on.

--
john smith
'_The Guardian_. Wrong about everything. All the time'
(Anon)

On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 08:48:30 +0000, John Smith
wrote:

JNugent wrote:
On 13/11/2015 17:07, John Smith wrote:
JNugent wrote:

Two years less than a woman was given for repeated rape, you mean?

Women cannot 'rape' in English law.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-31150/18-year-old-woman-convicted-rape.html

"18 year-old woman convicted of rape"

Fascinating. But wrong. Women cannot rape, because rape involves a penis.

Happy to have cleared things up for you.


You are a fool.

You claimed that women cannot 'rape' in English law.

If they can't - please explain why woman have been convicted of the offence.

Are you sure you weren't under the tutelage of M'Lud Lee - or perhaps just
under the influence in the same way that he is.

May I ask: have you a drink problem? It seems to be quite a common problem
with cyclists who frequent this group.