|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:07:27 -0800 (PST), Marie
wrote: http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co....ail/story.html "I've been nearly run over umpteen times" "I've been nearly knocked over a few times" Is there any evidence that cycling on the footway in Cheltenham Town Centre has ever hurt anyone? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On 19/11/2011 11:13, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:07:27 -0800 (PST), Marie wrote: http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co....ail/story.html "I've been nearly run over umpteen times" "I've been nearly knocked over a few times" Is there any evidence that cycling on the footway in Cheltenham Town Centre has ever hurt anyone? Would you accept an analogous argument to the effect that because no-one has yet been hit by a car in the pedestrianised part of High Street, Slagtown, that it's OK to ignore the "No motor vehicles" signs? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On Nov 19, 11:13*am, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:07:27 -0800 (PST), Marie wrote: http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co....ling-Cheltenha... "I've been nearly run over umpteen times" "I've been nearly knocked over a few times" Is there any evidence that cycling on the footway in Cheltenham Town Centre has ever hurt anyone? Ah, yes that old chestnut. I have lost count of the number of times I have "nearly" been run over by bike/car/van. -- Simon Mason |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:51:44 -0000, "Zapp Brannigan"
wrote: Driving past a cyclist with 1cm clearance has never hurt anybody either Factually incorrect. I will dig out the reference when I have a minute hit there was a case discussed a couple of years back where a woman passed by a cyclist too close, but did not hit the cyclist; the cyclist lost control as a result and was killed. The woman was convicted. Guy -- Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed to be worth at least what you paid for them. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On 20/11/2011 01:15, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:51:44 -0000, "Zapp wrote: Driving past a cyclist with 1cm clearance has never hurt anybody either Factually incorrect. I will dig out the reference when I have a minute hit there was a case discussed a couple of years back where a woman passed by a cyclist too close, but did not hit the cyclist; the cyclist lost control as a result and was killed. The woman was convicted... ....of? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Positive discriminating for cyclists
On Nov 20, 1:15*am, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote: On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:51:44 -0000, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote: Driving past a cyclist with 1cm clearance has never hurt anybody either Factually incorrect. I will dig out the reference when I have a minute hit there was a case discussed a couple of years back where a woman passed by a cyclist too close, but did not hit the cyclist; the cyclist lost control as a result and was killed. The woman was convicted. In the USA in many states there is a mandatory 3 feet passing rule *precisely* for that very reason. -- Simon Mason |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Positive not a Positive for Gymnasts? | Martin Ver Strunk | Racing | 1 | July 30th 08 11:22 PM |
How long will a positive homologous test subject remain positive? | MrBob | Racing | 14 | July 26th 07 02:03 PM |
Three unnamed cyclists test positive for doping during the Giro d'Italia | Jason Spaceman | Racing | 5 | June 15th 07 03:01 PM |
positive view of cyclists in the media | Peter | UK | 37 | February 13th 06 08:37 PM |
A Positive Image for Cyclists | MatSav | UK | 56 | May 15th 05 03:07 PM |