Police get tough with scofflaws

On 01/06/2013 16:50, Justin wrote:
On 1 jun, 16:45, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 11:50, Justin wrote:



On 1 jun, 11:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:

On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

Can you just confirm and guarantee that I will not turn up in Harwich?

Could you just confirm that you didn't turn up at Dover, Marks Tey &
Gillingham?

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

You clearly stated that I will not turn up in Harwich. You dare not
repeat that statement. Was it ******** or are you retracting it?
I was not in Gillingham but I was in both Dover and Marks Tey.

Nollocks.



--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On 01/06/2013 16:10, Partac wrote:


"JNugent" wrote in message ...

On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...t-31052013.htm


QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

For the avoidance of doubt, I've taken the liberty of posting the Google
Earth street view of the road in question. I'll leave it up to the panel
to decide whether she was genuinely mistaken, or if she was just lying
through her teeth:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/96800572@N02/8912745605/

Be fair. Those red discs with the white stripe ore only 60cm in
diameter. Cyclists like Justipoo's can completely miss the entire front
of a hotel.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On Sat, 1 Jun 2013 08:46:36 -0700 (PDT), Justin
wrote:

snip

Dare you repeat
that, were you talking nollocks or are you retracting your statement.


Excellent value as ever.

--
Wearing a cycle helmet will not kill you.

On Fri, 31 May 2013 09:40:45 -0700 (PDT), Justin
wrote:

On 31 mei, 16:41, "Partac" wrote:
"Mrcheerful" *wrote in ...
Partac wrote:
http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

Arrested for trying to ride off before getting a FPN, typical cyclist hoping
that anonymity will prevent apprehension.

I'm just amazed at how she thought trying to make off from a police stop a
"minor matter".
Just gives some insight into the mind of a psycholist, I suppose.



Excellent - one of your best posts yet.

You really are a ****** you know.

But excellent value.

--
Wearing a cycle helmet will not kill you.

On 1 June, 10:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f....

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. * By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. *Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

the woman was arrested despite no witness that she had contravened any
regulation that applied to her and the location in the presence of
appropriate signage.

On 1 June, 14:02, JNugent wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:









On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f....

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a rush to
get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had not realised
it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train to work
every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency

A police officer, you mean?

believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong

You have no reason for it to "seem" that way to you. Thinking is a
personal matter. The cyclist was arrested for seeking to leave the scene
of her observed breach of the law - that is, her illegal *action*, not
her improper thought.


What precisely have you ascertained was observed directly from reading
the article and what have you imagined?


and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. * By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

Really?

Do you believe that she didn't know that the street was one-way, despite
signage to say so (as there always is)

It has not been reported that there was adequate signage. It has not
been reported that the woman had passed any signage or that any order
had been made at the location. It has not been reported in what way
she is supposed to have agreed to comply with any regulation that may
or may not exist for some persons.

and the her going that way to
work every day?

Does she work for the government? Does it say?

She should be convicted of attempted insult of the intelligence (I'll
exempt you from victimhood there - it seems that it didn't insult
yours), let alone anything else.

When government wish to wrap the people in legislation, they have to
get their agreement. I do not work for the government and am not
bound by their legislation on matters which I have not explicitly
agreed to.

On 1 June, 14:52, "Zapp Brannigan" wrote:
"thirty-six" wrote in message

...

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. * By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

You would be wrong then. * A constable may issue an FPN to any person they
see fit,

It's quite obvious I am not fit and I would make it be known that I am
not bound by parliamentary legislation, unlike crown officers.

it is then for that person

What person? You appear to be making an assumption that each soul
has a person, this is incorrect. A person only exists when one's soul
is surrendered. The existence of a person is an illusion, it is a
fictional entity used for enslavement. Agreement to being a person is
acceptance of much artificial law. I would be happy to read about a
"person" in my book of truth, please guide me to the relevant parts of
the King James Bible. Be aware that this is the book I shall hold at
court. This is not for theatrics, but to uphold the truth.
..
to decide whether they admit guilt or
have the matter resolved by a court. * If a person attempts to leave while a
constable is issuing an FPN, then the power of arrest is lawfully available.

I AM NOT A PERSON, I AM A FREE MAN!

36 ;-)


GOT IT? (probably not)

On 1 June, 10:19, ennemm wrote:
On 1 June, 02:18, thirty-six wrote:

On May 31, 3:41*pm, "Partac" wrote:

"Mrcheerful" *wrote in ...
Partac wrote:
http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

Arrested for trying to ride off before getting a FPN, typical cyclist hoping
that anonymity will prevent apprehension.

I'm just amazed at how she thought trying to make off from a police stop a
"minor matter".

If she believes that he has not been lawfully authorised to stop her
from travelling, he hasn't, she is totally in order to continue on her
way.

Didn't work though did it, I wonder why that could be?

most likely because the copper is as thick as pig****. It is typical
amongst the indoctrinated.

thirty-six wrote:
On 1 June, 10:06, Dave- Cyclists VORC
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:







On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a
rush to get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had
not realised it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train
to work every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

FFS we have another one.

Large latte & an espresso please.

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should
grow out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who
want to ride a bike."

the woman was arrested despite no witness that she had contravened any
regulation that applied to her and the location in the presence of
appropriate signage.

The witness was the person that detained her. tTaffic signage and the laws
applicable to them applies to traffic, bicycles are traffic. Would you like
a longer shovel?

thirty-six wrote:
On 1 June, 14:02, JNugent wrote:
On 01/06/2013 02:14, thirty-six wrote:









On May 31, 11:39 am, JNugent wrote:
On 31/05/2013 11:32, Partac wrote:

http://www.windsorexpress.co.uk/News...ist-arrested-f...

QUOTE:
...the woman told an employee at the estate agent she was in a
rush to get a train to work when she cycled up the street and had
not realised it was one-way.
ENDQUOTE

What, it's on her way to the station where she catches the train
to work every day and she "had not realised it was one-way"?

Yeah, right.

fro m the article in question it seems that an officer for the crown
collection agency

A police officer, you mean?

believed that the cyclist's thinking be wrong

You have no reason for it to "seem" that way to you. Thinking is a
personal matter. The cyclist was arrested for seeking to leave the
scene of her observed breach of the law - that is, her illegal
*action*, not her improper thought.


What precisely have you ascertained was observed directly from reading
the article and what have you imagined?


and
decided he could arrest despite there being no evidence that any
signage (whether or not exists) was contravened with intent, or
otherwise. By all accounts presented, this appears to be an unlawful
arrest causing personal injury and unnecessary detention.

Really?

Do you believe that she didn't know that the street was one-way,
despite signage to say so (as there always is)

It has not been reported that there was adequate signage. It has not
been reported that the woman had passed any signage or that any order
had been made at the location. It has not been reported in what way
she is supposed to have agreed to comply with any regulation that may
or may not exist for some persons.

and the her going that way to
work every day?

Does she work for the government? Does it say?

She should be convicted of attempted insult of the intelligence (I'll
exempt you from victimhood there - it seems that it didn't insult
yours), let alone anything else.

When government wish to wrap the people in legislation, they have to
get their agreement. I do not work for the government and am not
bound by their legislation on matters which I have not explicitly
agreed to.

yes, she teleported past the gbfo signs that say no entry.