|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
IMPORTANT:
UNLESS YOU ARE A TROLL. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST. THIS IS INFORMATION ONLY. IT IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF A DISCUSSION. Well he seems to be back on the warpath again and he is not either confining himself to an off-topic thread nor is he posting anything that is on topic (although he will almost certainly say he is). So for what it is worth, here is Jeff Grippe's method for battling the Troll. It is a method that I think will work and it is one that hasn't been tried. Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. Jeff's Troll Fighting Method (some components are not new but the method must be seen as a whole) 1. Do not respond to any of Ed Dolan new off-topic threads. 2. If you must respond to Ed or about Ed, find an old off-topic thread, like this one. 3. This is the big one. For each day the the troll posts new off-topic threads, start a new on-topic thread. That is the whole method. Step three is really the important one. Lets work to keep the group on topic and minimize the impact of the troll. Jeff |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
Note to Jeff:
Well excuse me there Jeff, but don't you think you're being more than a little unfair here? Whereas I can appreciate your reiterated condensed version of what Wane had already said in this regard, I can only do so up until the point where you deviated from his original guidelines. Both in this thread and also in your new thread ... Fighting the Troll - My Method - Do Not Reply - OFF TOPIC, you specifically singled me out. You wrote ... Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. On I got the message that you didn't want a response to this "informational" post, but did you actually expect your unnecessary "Note to Jim" to go unchallenged merely because your request was front ended with the remark ... UNLESS YOUR A TROLL??? Please take notice that on the 23rd, in this very thread, I posted the following to Perry Butler and bear in mind that was FIVE DAYS AGO!!! Relax. You will note that I have not responded to the troll's latest bait, and have no such intention either. I'm done with him and will follow Tom's god example in this regard. I have learned that a troll's adversary is not really an adversary but rather an ally or sorts, if you know what I mean, but enough about the troll I would like to see this effort succeed as much as anyone else, so fear not, I'll not be feeding the troll. Though I've been baited by the troll, 5 days have since elapsed and I have not made a single post in response to or in reference to the troll. In fact, I haven't posted anything on ARBR for 4 days now and the two posts that I made four days ago were with regard to a discussion (primarily with you) about trails. Now lets examine the posting statistics over the past 5-day, shall we? During this 5-day period, I neither responded to nor even referred to the troll in a single post. During this same 5-day period, you responded directly to the troll as follows: 2 times in this thread. 1 time in the "Rail Trails" thread. 1 time in the "Tour de Palm Springs" thread. Count 'em. That's 5 times. The score at the end of this five-day period then is Jeff FIVE and Jim ZERO. Now correctly me if I'm wrong Jeff, but the numbers would seem to indicate that you are not entitled to be casting aspersion on me. The old adage ... he who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones come to mind. Don't take this too personal, but you spoke out of turn. While you were still responding to the troll, I was not. Consequently, you were in no position to offer advice to me who was not part an parcel of the problem during a period when the posting statistic indicate you still were. Now I don't' want to enter into a ****ing match over all this. I feel it is important for members to remain united in the cause, concerted in our efforts and leave the potshots to the troll. Jim McNamara On Jan 28, 4:29 am, "Jeff Grippe" wrote: IMPORTANT: UNLESS YOU ARE A TROLL. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST. THIS IS INFORMATION ONLY. IT IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF A DISCUSSION. Well he seems to be back on the warpath again and he is not either confining himself to an off-topic thread nor is he posting anything that is on topic (although he will almost certainly say he is). So for what it is worth, here is Jeff Grippe's method for battling the Troll. It is a method that I think will work and it is one that hasn't been tried. Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. Jeff's Troll Fighting Method (some components are not new but the method must be seen as a whole) 1. Do not respond to any of Ed Dolan new off-topic threads. 2. If you must respond to Ed or about Ed, find an old off-topic thread, like this one. 3. This is the big one. For each day the the troll posts new off-topic threads, start a new on-topic thread. That is the whole method. Step three is really the important one. Lets work to keep the group on topic and minimize the impact of the troll. Jeff |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
Jim,
I did not intend to offend you and I concede that it was wrong of me to single you out, especially since I have risen to the bait far too many times myself. Please accept my apology for having do this. As a fellow human being I ask your tolerance that I be allowed to make a mistake once in a while. Singling you out in that post was a mistake. In reality, I was talking to and about myself as much as you or anyone else. I also do not want to enter into a contest with you or anyone else. Once again, I ask you to please forgive that bone-headed mistake. Regards, Jeff "JimmyMac" wrote in message oups.com... Note to Jeff: Well excuse me there Jeff, but don't you think you're being more than a little unfair here? Whereas I can appreciate your reiterated condensed version of what Wane had already said in this regard, I can only do so up until the point where you deviated from his original guidelines. Both in this thread and also in your new thread ... Fighting the Troll - My Method - Do Not Reply - OFF TOPIC, you specifically singled me out. You wrote ... Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. On I got the message that you didn't want a response to this "informational" post, but did you actually expect your unnecessary "Note to Jim" to go unchallenged merely because your request was front ended with the remark ... UNLESS YOUR A TROLL??? Please take notice that on the 23rd, in this very thread, I posted the following to Perry Butler and bear in mind that was FIVE DAYS AGO!!! Relax. You will note that I have not responded to the troll's latest bait, and have no such intention either. I'm done with him and will follow Tom's god example in this regard. I have learned that a troll's adversary is not really an adversary but rather an ally or sorts, if you know what I mean, but enough about the troll I would like to see this effort succeed as much as anyone else, so fear not, I'll not be feeding the troll. Though I've been baited by the troll, 5 days have since elapsed and I have not made a single post in response to or in reference to the troll. In fact, I haven't posted anything on ARBR for 4 days now and the two posts that I made four days ago were with regard to a discussion (primarily with you) about trails. Now lets examine the posting statistics over the past 5-day, shall we? During this 5-day period, I neither responded to nor even referred to the troll in a single post. During this same 5-day period, you responded directly to the troll as follows: 2 times in this thread. 1 time in the "Rail Trails" thread. 1 time in the "Tour de Palm Springs" thread. Count 'em. That's 5 times. The score at the end of this five-day period then is Jeff FIVE and Jim ZERO. Now correctly me if I'm wrong Jeff, but the numbers would seem to indicate that you are not entitled to be casting aspersion on me. The old adage ... he who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones come to mind. Don't take this too personal, but you spoke out of turn. While you were still responding to the troll, I was not. Consequently, you were in no position to offer advice to me who was not part an parcel of the problem during a period when the posting statistic indicate you still were. Now I don't' want to enter into a ****ing match over all this. I feel it is important for members to remain united in the cause, concerted in our efforts and leave the potshots to the troll. Jim McNamara On Jan 28, 4:29 am, "Jeff Grippe" wrote: IMPORTANT: UNLESS YOU ARE A TROLL. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST. THIS IS INFORMATION ONLY. IT IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF A DISCUSSION. Well he seems to be back on the warpath again and he is not either confining himself to an off-topic thread nor is he posting anything that is on topic (although he will almost certainly say he is). So for what it is worth, here is Jeff Grippe's method for battling the Troll. It is a method that I think will work and it is one that hasn't been tried. Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. Jeff's Troll Fighting Method (some components are not new but the method must be seen as a whole) 1. Do not respond to any of Ed Dolan new off-topic threads. 2. If you must respond to Ed or about Ed, find an old off-topic thread, like this one. 3. This is the big one. For each day the the troll posts new off-topic threads, start a new on-topic thread. That is the whole method. Step three is really the important one. Lets work to keep the group on topic and minimize the impact of the troll. Jeff |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
Jeff,
I felt it was wrong that I was singled out simply because I was abiding by the guidelines when others were not including yourself, but tis the human condition to make a mistake and its human to acknowledge our mistakes, forgive those of others and to hope that others forgive ours. Apology accepted. Jim McNamara On Jan 29, 3:31 am, "Jeff Grippe" wrote: Jim, I did not intend to offend you and I concede that it was wrong of me to single you out, especially since I have risen to the bait far too many times myself. Please accept my apology for having do this. As a fellow human being I ask your tolerance that I be allowed to make a mistake once in a while. Singling you out in that post was a mistake. In reality, I was talking to and about myself as much as you or anyone else. I also do not want to enter into a contest with you or anyone else. Once again, I ask you to please forgive that bone-headed mistake. Regards, Jeff"JimmyMac" wrote in ooglegroups.com... Note to Jeff: Well excuse me there Jeff, but don't you think you're being more than a little unfair here? Whereas I can appreciate your reiterated condensed version of what Wane had already said in this regard, I can only do so up until the point where you deviated from his original guidelines. Both in this thread and also in your new thread ... Fighting the Troll - My Method - Do Not Reply - OFF TOPIC, you specifically singled me out. You wrote ... Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. On I got the message that you didn't want a response to this "informational" post, but did you actually expect your unnecessary "Note to Jim" to go unchallenged merely because your request was front ended with the remark ... UNLESS YOUR A TROLL??? Please take notice that on the 23rd, in this very thread, I posted the following to Perry Butler and bear in mind that was FIVE DAYS AGO!!! Relax. You will note that I have not responded to the troll's latest bait, and have no such intention either. I'm done with him and will follow Tom's god example in this regard. I have learned that a troll's adversary is not really an adversary but rather an ally or sorts, if you know what I mean, but enough about the troll I would like to see this effort succeed as much as anyone else, so fear not, I'll not be feeding the troll. Though I've been baited by the troll, 5 days have since elapsed and I have not made a single post in response to or in reference to the troll. In fact, I haven't posted anything on ARBR for 4 days now and the two posts that I made four days ago were with regard to a discussion (primarily with you) about trails. Now lets examine the posting statistics over the past 5-day, shall we? During this 5-day period, I neither responded to nor even referred to the troll in a single post. During this same 5-day period, you responded directly to the troll as follows: 2 times in this thread. 1 time in the "Rail Trails" thread. 1 time in the "Tour de Palm Springs" thread. Count 'em. That's 5 times. The score at the end of this five-day period then is Jeff FIVE and Jim ZERO. Now correctly me if I'm wrong Jeff, but the numbers would seem to indicate that you are not entitled to be casting aspersion on me. The old adage ... he who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones come to mind. Don't take this too personal, but you spoke out of turn. While you were still responding to the troll, I was not. Consequently, you were in no position to offer advice to me who was not part an parcel of the problem during a period when the posting statistic indicate you still were. Now I don't' want to enter into a ****ing match over all this. I feel it is important for members to remain united in the cause, concerted in our efforts and leave the potshots to the troll. Jim McNamara On Jan 28, 4:29 am, "Jeff Grippe" wrote: IMPORTANT: UNLESS YOU ARE A TROLL. DO NOT REPLY TO THIS POST. THIS IS INFORMATION ONLY. IT IS NOT THE BEGINNING OF A DISCUSSION. Well he seems to be back on the warpath again and he is not either confining himself to an off-topic thread nor is he posting anything that is on topic (although he will almost certainly say he is). So for what it is worth, here is Jeff Grippe's method for battling the Troll. It is a method that I think will work and it is one that hasn't been tried. Note to Jim: If you are serious about minimizing the troll's activities then please cooperate. Jeff's Troll Fighting Method (some components are not new but the method must be seen as a whole) 1. Do not respond to any of Ed Dolan new off-topic threads. 2. If you must respond to Ed or about Ed, find an old off-topic thread, like this one. 3. This is the big one. For each day the the troll posts new off-topic threads, start a new on-topic thread. That is the whole method. Step three is really the important one. Lets work to keep the group on topic and minimize the impact of the troll. Jeff |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
"JimmyMac" wrote in message oups.com... ALL TOP POSTERS ARE DIOTS! Note to Jeff: Blah, blah, blah ... [...] Though I've been baited by the troll, 5 days have since elapsed and I have not made a single post in response to or in reference to the troll. In fact, I haven't posted anything on ARBR for 4 days now and the two posts that I made four days ago were with regard to a discussion (primarily with you) about trails. Poor Jim is dying to stalk me. It is his nature. What else is a wimp like him to do? But here is Jim taking his one ally to task for not being on the same page as him. Well, that is Jim McNamara for you. Either stroke his ego or get lost. Now lets examine the posting statistics over the past 5-day, shall we? During this 5-day period, I neither responded to nor even referred to the troll in a single post. During this same 5-day period, you responded directly to the troll as follows: 2 times in this thread. 1 time in the "Rail Trails" thread. 1 time in the "Tour de Palm Springs" thread. Count 'em. That's 5 times. The score at the end of this five-day period then is Jeff FIVE and Jim ZERO. Now correctly me if I'm wrong Jeff, but the numbers would seem to indicate that you are not entitled to be casting aspersion on me. The old adage ... he who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw stones come to mind. Notice how this jerk keeps score. I mean, just how pitiful can you get! Don't take this too personal, but you spoke out of turn. While you were still responding to the troll, I was not. Consequently, you were in no position to offer advice to me who was not part an parcel of the problem during a period when the posting statistic indicate you still were. Now I don't' want to enter into a ****ing match over all this. I feel it is important for members to remain united in the cause, concerted in our efforts and leave the potshots to the troll. Hey, Jeff, Jim wants to have a ****ing match with you. Why don't you oblige him. That is the only thing in this world that makes him happy. It is all he has ever been good for on this newsgroup from the beginning, just one ****ing match after another; first with Ed Gin, then with Tom Sherman and finally with me. How about you Jeff? Get your pecker out and prepare to **** why don't you? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
"Jeff Grippe" wrote in message ... ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS! Jim, I did not intend to offend you and I concede that it was wrong of me to single you out, especially since I have risen to the bait far too many times myself. You will always offend Jim McNamara unless you are stroking his sensitive ego. He is like a child that way. Just tell him how wonderful you think he is and he will purr like a kitten. Please accept my apology for having do this. As a fellow human being I ask your tolerance that I be allowed to make a mistake once in a while. Singling you out in that post was a mistake. You have now really scored with McNamara! He loves to have others apologizing to him for slights that no one else would even notice. In reality, I was talking to and about myself as much as you or anyone else. Not if you are a paranoid nut like McNamara. How could you be so stupid? I also do not want to enter into a contest with you or anyone else. Once again, I ask you to please forgive that bone-headed mistake. Jesus Christ God Almighty!!! Screw McNamara all the way to Hell and back! Instead of saying you are sorry for nothing, you should be kicking his sorry ass all over the newsgroup. Jeff, you are as hopeless as he is. Thank God I don't know either of you! What a pair of misfits the both of you are! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
DON'T FEED THE TROLL! - Off Topic
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ups.com... ALL TOP POSTERS ARE IDIOTS! Jeff, I felt it was wrong that I was singled out simply because I was abiding by the guidelines when others were not including yourself, but tis the human condition to make a mistake and its human to acknowledge our mistakes, forgive those of others and to hope that others forgive ours. Apology accepted. McNamara feels things deeply because he is unable to think rationally about anything. What is really amusing is that McNamara has accepted an apology instead of giving one. Jeff Grippe would have done better to kick his sorry ass all over the newsgroup instead of abasing himself before the entire group for absolutely nothing. Jeff can keep on apologizing to Jim for all eternity and Jim will keep on accepting those apologies from Jeff for all eternity. Truly a marriage made in Hell! Ed Gin,Tom Sherman and Ed Dolan NEVER apologized to McNamara for anything - EVER! But maybe Jeff Grippe knows something that the rest of us don't! Like how to be a sap! Only McNamara makes mistakes on this newsgroup, the chief one being showing up here in the first place. Ed Gin - where the **** are you when you are needed here to coral this supreme nincompoop who goes by the name of McNamara? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Troll Matt B - do not feed | [email protected] | UK | 6 | September 22nd 06 08:54 AM |
Please do not feed the Troll Matt B. | [email protected] | UK | 19 | September 16th 06 05:56 PM |
On or Off topic, and why feed the trolls? | John Smith | Recumbent Biking | 17 | November 1st 04 05:08 AM |