Another "invisible" cyclist?

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who approaches,
attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his bike and you
"think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow impossible for the
criminal on the bike to have been visible to his victim at such close
quarters and that it is connected to bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he can
do much more of it.

JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark
coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black
coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who
approaches, attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his
bike and you "think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow
impossible for the criminal on the bike to have been visible to his
victim at such close quarters and that it is connected to
bicycle-lighting (of all things)?
You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he
can do much more of it.

Mr Mason seems to be getting worse.

On 12/11/2019 17:24, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark
coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black
coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who
approaches, attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his
bike and you "think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow
impossible for the criminal on the bike to have been visible to his
victim at such close quarters and that it is connected to
bicycle-lighting (of all things)?
You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he
can do much more of it.

Mr Mason seems to be getting worse.




Perhaps his medication needs revision.

On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who approaches,
attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his bike and you
"think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow impossible for the
criminal on the bike to have been visible to his victim at such close
quarters and that it is connected to bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he can
do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack.
Glad you agree it is time for compulsory pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark
coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black
coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who
approaches, attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on
his bike and you "think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow
impossible for the criminal on the bike to have been visible to his
victim at such close quarters and that it is connected to
bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he
can do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the
time of the alleged attack. Glad you agree it is time for compulsory
pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

Getting worse.

On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 7:24:21 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark
coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black
coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who
approaches, attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on
his bike and you "think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow
impossible for the criminal on the bike to have been visible to his
victim at such close quarters and that it is connected to
bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he
can do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the
time of the alleged attack. Glad you agree it is time for compulsory
pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

Getting worse.

Climate change? Or your obsession with male cyclists shaven legs?

On 12/11/2019 18:41, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who approaches,
attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his bike and you
"think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow impossible for the
criminal on the bike to have been visible to his victim at such close
quarters and that it is connected to bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he can
do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack.
Glad you agree it is time for compulsory pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

More random musings from Jester/Fool.

On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 4:53:59 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 18:41, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who approaches,
attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his bike and you
"think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow impossible for the
criminal on the bike to have been visible to his victim at such close
quarters and that it is connected to bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he can
do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack.
Glad you agree it is time for compulsory pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

More random musings from Jester/Fool.

Are you saying you have evidence the perp was riding a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack?
Is it or is it not not more likely the alleged perp was a pedestrian who used a SUV as a getaway vehicle?
Do you deny it would be easier to identify pedestrian criminals if they had compulsory registration numbers clearly displayed at all times?

On 13/11/2019 18:41, Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, November 13, 2019 at 4:53:59 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 18:41, Simon Jester wrote:
On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 3:59:25 PM UTC, JNugent wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

QUOTE:
"Described as being around 30-years-old, the man was wearing dark coloured jogging bottoms, a hooded top with the hood up, a black coat and a grey scarf which was pulled over his face."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news...yclist-3528673

A description is given by the victim of a violent robber who approaches,
attacks and robs a defenceless woman then scarpers on his bike and you
"think" that it is funny? Or that it is somehow impossible for the
criminal on the bike to have been visible to his victim at such close
quarters and that it is connected to bicycle-lighting (of all things)?

You are *sick*.

Sensible people can only hope that this cyclist is caught before he can
do much more of it.

So there is no evidence the alleged robber was on a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack.
Glad you agree it is time for compulsory pedestrian registration and identification numbers.

More random musings from Jester/Fool.

Are you saying you have evidence the perp was riding a bicycle at the time of the alleged attack?

What difference does that make?

Is it or is it not not more likely the alleged perp was a pedestrian who used a SUV as a getaway vehicle?

That isn't the slightest bit likely, because he used a bicycle as a
getaway (and approach) vehicle.

Can you read, or not?

[That question may well be understood as being rhetorical in nature.]

Do you deny it would be easier to identify pedestrian criminals if they had compulsory registration numbers clearly displayed at all times?

What is the relevance of your very odd question?