A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

fit



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 30th 04, 05:21 PM
Deb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default fit

I've seen some fit stories in some messages, and just thought I'd
throw this one out there, too.

I'm 5'2.5". I have short legs, short arms, and yup, a short torso. I
would really prefer NOT to have 650c wheels/tires if I can avoid it.
I'm putting my old Klein into retirement as a getting to work
bike/travel bike (it is an old aluminum frame bike that was new in
like '98). I think my Klein is like a 51cm...but I can't remember
exactly.

Mostly i like to just ride, and occasionally i like to ride long
(trained for an ironman last year). I certainly would like an upgrade
and am thinking that I'd like something a little softer to ride on,
i.e., not aluminum. I'm not a super serious, competitive rider, but I
do like to be comfortable, and appreciate a nice bike. I'll probably
be doing some longer rides--50+ miles, 2-3x/wk but probably not racing
(maybe an occasional tri).

I'm a little averse to Bianchi...not the company or what they do, just
that i've tested these bikes a bunch of times and just don't seem to
work for me--not comfy--ironically, I think the top tube is too short.
I'd be up for a Trek, I suppose...just about other choices out there.

So, here is the question:
I know a bunch of folks out there have so much more experience than I
do. What manufacturers would you suggest for frames (am willing to
build my own)that would be suitable for my needs???

Thanks in advance!
Deb
Ads
  #2  
Old November 30th 04, 07:37 PM
Harris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Deb wrote:

I'm 5'2.5". I have short legs, short arms, and yup, a short torso. I
would really prefer NOT to have 650c wheels/tires if I can avoid it.


I understand your reluctance to 650c wheels, but that's about the only way
to get a "normal" geometry in a small frame. Compact frames have some
advantages, but you still get a weird geometry and/or toe overlap.

I'm putting my old Klein into retirement as a getting to work
bike/travel bike (it is an old aluminum frame bike that was new in
like '98). I think my Klein is like a 51cm...but I can't remember
exactly.


"Frame size" (i.e., seat tube length) isn't the most critical thing in a
fit. Concentrate more on top tube length, and the overall geometry
including BB height.

I'm a little averse to Bianchi...not the company or what they do, just
that i've tested these bikes a bunch of times and just don't seem to
work for me--not comfy--ironically, I think the top tube is too short.
I'd be up for a Trek, I suppose...just about other choices out there.


Unless the bike is set up properly for you, a test ride can be misleading.
What don't you like about your current bike? I don't really buy the
"aluminum is harsh" theory. Is there a particular problem with fit or
handling?

Art Harris
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.