Pavement motorist jailed for 12 years.

On Jan 18, 2:42*pm, "Partac" wrote:
"Simon Mason" *wrote in message

...

On Jan 18, 1:56 pm, "Partac" wrote:





"Simon Mason" *wrote in message

....

On Jan 18, 1:08 pm, "Partac" wrote:

"Simon Mason" *wrote in message

....

On Jan 18, 11:05 am, "Partac" wrote:

It hasn't taken me long to realise I would rather socialise with the
likes
of Judith and Dave, etc., who at least seem to have a witty sense of
humour
and appear very normal to me.

Judith and Dave - normal?

Jesus Christ.

One is an obsessive cowardly psychopath and the other a 61 year old
bodge merchant with Tourettes.

If you consider them "normal" then quite frankly there is no hope for
you.

I have seen no evidence of either of the claims you are making, could
you
please supply some?

No - thanks.
I killfiled them both ages ago and have no wish to read their foul
abuses of me, my wife, my daughters, my home, my birth place, my job,
my holidays, the food I eat, my drinking habits and so on. The last
time I had to read any that hate filled bile was when I showed it all
to the police last August.

What did the police prosecute them for, then?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Online harassment, cyberstalking and sending malicious and threatening
messages using a computer network.

What was their punishment when they were taken to court?- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Their court cases are still ongoing.

There is an overwhelming smell around here. I wonder what can it be? Oh, I
recognise it, it's bull****!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Do you want an invite to Guy's post court case wrap party?
Then you can see that it was all real, my friend.

--
Simon Mason

On Jan 25, 11:19*pm, JNugent wrote:
On 18/01/2012 07:44, Doug wrote:

Its amazing that such people are let loose on our roads and pavements.
What if a cyclist had happened to get in his way? Presumably he will
be allowed to drive again and put lives at risk following his 10 year
driving ban.

"A drunken motorist who drove his car at a group of his friends
following a row outside a Bristol pub has been jailed for 12 years.

Luke Julius, 25, from Bedminster, mounted a pavement and hit 26-year-
old Beverley Cousins on 11 September 2011.

Bristol Crown Court heard she was so badly injured that she had her
right leg amputated above the knee.

There ought to be a law against that sort of thing.

This is one example where a motorist has not been allowed to get away
with it or has not received a slap on the wrist this time. The problem
with laws is that they are not always enforced properly and can be
subject to discretion or bias.

-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:25:35 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote:

snip


Do you want an invite to Guy's post court case wrap party?
Then you can see that it was all real, my friend.



Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

It looks like Porky Chapman has not even told his "friends" what has happened.

It's off - the party is OFF.

Rumour has it that Porky pulled the complaint as he was told that he himself
would have to appear in a witness box and face some searching questions !!!

(Under oath and as a christian)

After all that hullabaloo initially it is odd that he hasn't had the decency to
tell people what has happened - perhaps he is concocting a story :-) (Again)

On Jan 26, 7:17*am, Doug wrote:


This is one example where a motorist has not been allowed to get away
with it or has not received a slap on the wrist this time. The problem
with laws is that they are not always enforced properly and can be
subject to discretion or bias.


These parking laws *are* being enforced as I have seen the tickets
with my own eyes.

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/parkers1.jpg

--
Simon Mason

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:18:15 +0000, Judith wrote:



Porky


Hagfish eyespots, when present, can detect light, but as far as is known
none can resolve detailed images.

--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:17:33 -0800, Doug wrote:



-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.


No it isn't.


--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On Jan 27, 7:08*am, Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:17:33 -0800, Doug wrote:

-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

No it isn't.

--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

Like your lie that 'it isn't'?

On 29/01/2012 08:58, Doug wrote:
On Jan 27, 7:08 am, Peter wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:17:33 -0800, Doug wrote:

-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

No it isn't.

--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

Like your lie that 'it isn't'?

OK, then ownership of a bike allows you to ride on the pavement.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:58:22 -0800, Doug wrote:

On Jan 27, 7:08Â*am, Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:17:33 -0800, Doug wrote:

-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

No it isn't.

--


Like your lie that 'it isn't'?


Nowhere in the conditions attached to my driving licencce is there any
mention of the conditions under which I may kill someone.


--
An oft-repeated lie is still a lie.

On Jan 29, 9:54*pm, Peter Keller wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 00:58:22 -0800, Doug wrote:
On Jan 27, 7:08*am, Peter Keller wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:17:33 -0800, Doug wrote:

-- .
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

No it isn't.

--

Like your lie that 'it isn't'?

Nowhere in the conditions attached to my driving licencce is there any
mention of the conditions under which I may kill someone.

I doubt if James Bond had it down on paper either. Its what can happen
afterwards that counts and all the evidence proves it.

Doug.