A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Jester alive but still can't answer simple question.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old September 4th 15, 08:03 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Jester alive but still can't answer simple question.

"JNugent" wrote
On 04/09/2015 10:49, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote in message


[And it is the Highway Code upon which cyclists rely for their misplaced
assertions that cyclists should be given a hundred yards' lateral
clearance when being overtaken (in case they wobble).]


A few days ago it was 15 feet. Then it increased to 20 feet. Now it is
100
yards. Is this Zimbabwean inflation?


Irony and sarcasm not your things?

BTW, the Highway Code tells drivers to "give motorcyclists, cyclists and
horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car."


Which is...?


It depends, obviously. In all your years, have you never noticed?

Obviously another case of - if you ride a bicycle you can't possibly know
how much room that would be.


We've had all of this before.


Indeed. And it rolls off people like you like water from a duck's back.

There are lots of circumstances in heavy traffic where clearance between
motor vehicles can be as little as a foot or two without anyone throwing a
strop (particularly at junctions where one vehicle is turning and the
other isn't).


So you're trying to tell me how drivers behave from a drivers perspective?
You have just reinforced my point elsewhere of assuming a bicycle user
doesn't drive (or walk).

Oh, and one or two feet would be nicer than 6 inches.


Ads
  #22  
Old September 4th 15, 08:38 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.


"David Lang" wrote in message
...
On 04/09/2015 19:14, Bod wrote:
On 04/09/2015 18:01, David Lang wrote:
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message
...
On 03/09/2015 23:54, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
Here it is again, in case he's forgotton

All the evidence by the knowledgeable bodies mentioned; The Highway
Code,
RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the
Ambulance Service, TFL, Sustrans and many other august bodies all
strongly
recommend bicycle helmets.

Why are you arrogant (and stupid) enough to disagree with people
who are
far more knowledgeable than you?

You haven't answered the question I put to you earlier. Who says they
are knowledgeable on this subject?

Are you retarded in some way? Has anal reflexology damaged your
brain?

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS,
the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL &
Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of
mopping up
after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.

That confirms it. You are retarded.

Do you still get an erection when you're angry?



You have a penis fixation.


Excuse him. He will be drugged up out of his mind at this time.











  #23  
Old September 4th 15, 09:17 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.

"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??


My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.


That confirms it. You are retarded.


Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers
to type the question?


  #24  
Old September 4th 15, 09:32 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
David Lang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,816
Default TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.

On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.


That confirms it. You are retarded.


Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers
to type the question?


That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast
experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head trauma.

For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you
seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its prevention?

RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website, all of
which conclude cyclists should wear helmets.


  #25  
Old September 4th 15, 10:53 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default David Lang can't answer his own questions.


"David Lang" wrote in message
On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS,
the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL &
Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of
mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.

That confirms it. You are retarded.


Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your
fingers
to type the question?

That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast
experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head
trauma.


That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an
answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't
answer.

For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you
seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its
prevention?


I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in
transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time
researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this
remit and misusing taxpayer money. If they are doing such research, and
giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If
their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless.

Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not
change the matter.

RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website...


....which you haven't read.


  #26  
Old September 4th 15, 11:36 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
David Lang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,816
Default David Lang can't answer his own questions.

On 04/09/2015 22:53, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message
On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS,
the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL &
Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of
mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.

That confirms it. You are retarded.

Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your
fingers
to type the question?

That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast
experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head
trauma.


That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an
answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't
answer.


Try that again in English. I did ask a question and I didn't get an answer.

Do you have a point?

For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you
seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its
prevention?


I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in
transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time
researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this
remit and misusing taxpayer money.


The Ambulance Service spend a lot of time doing research like this. It
makes them more efficient.


If they are doing such research, and
giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If
their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless.


It is available. But not to moronic cyclists.

Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not
change the matter.


When I describe you as a retard it isn't an insult, it's a factual
description.

RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website...


...which you haven't read.


I have - you haven't.



  #27  
Old September 5th 15, 12:33 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default David Lang can't answer his own questions.


"David Lang" wrote in message
...
On 04/09/2015 22:53, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message
On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS,
the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL &
Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head
trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?"
(The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of
mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.

That confirms it. You are retarded.

Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your
fingers
to type the question?

That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast
experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head
trauma.


That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an
answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't
answer.


Try that again in English. I did ask a question and I didn't get an
answer.


You asked a question. You wanted an anser to "You seriously doubt that..?",
which would be "yes" or "no". Which were you looking for?

Do you have a point?


You've spent lots of time flogging this to death. You seem to think you have
a point and the process is to tease out what it might be. Except you just
keep repeating something about the ambulance service.

For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you
seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its
prevention?


I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in
transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend
time
researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this
remit and misusing taxpayer money.


The Ambulance Service spend a lot of time doing research like this. It
makes them more efficient.


Then you or they (most likely you) don't understand their function.

If they are doing such research, and
giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If
their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless.


It is available. But not to moronic cyclists.


Try me.

Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not
change the matter.


When I describe you as a retard it isn't an insult, it's a factual
description.

RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website...


...which you haven't read.


I have -


....then failed to understand.



  #28  
Old September 5th 15, 09:15 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
David Lang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,816
Default TMS320 completely Dagenham.

I have no idea what he is on about now. It appears to be a gibbering
rant, but I have no idea what he is saying anymore.

Can anyone help?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jester still can't answer simple question. David Lang UK 2 September 2nd 15 09:00 AM
Jester still unable to answer simple question David Lang UK 3 September 1st 15 09:17 PM
Jester unable to answer another simple question David Lang UK 3 August 30th 15 11:19 PM
Jester unable or unwilling to answer simple question. David Lang UK 14 August 30th 15 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.