|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Jester alive but still can't answer simple question.
"JNugent" wrote
On 04/09/2015 10:49, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote in message [And it is the Highway Code upon which cyclists rely for their misplaced assertions that cyclists should be given a hundred yards' lateral clearance when being overtaken (in case they wobble).] A few days ago it was 15 feet. Then it increased to 20 feet. Now it is 100 yards. Is this Zimbabwean inflation? Irony and sarcasm not your things? BTW, the Highway Code tells drivers to "give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much room as you would when overtaking a car." Which is...? It depends, obviously. In all your years, have you never noticed? Obviously another case of - if you ride a bicycle you can't possibly know how much room that would be. We've had all of this before. Indeed. And it rolls off people like you like water from a duck's back. There are lots of circumstances in heavy traffic where clearance between motor vehicles can be as little as a foot or two without anyone throwing a strop (particularly at junctions where one vehicle is turning and the other isn't). So you're trying to tell me how drivers behave from a drivers perspective? You have just reinforced my point elsewhere of assuming a bicycle user doesn't drive (or walk). Oh, and one or two feet would be nicer than 6 inches. |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.
"David Lang" wrote in message ... On 04/09/2015 19:14, Bod wrote: On 04/09/2015 18:01, David Lang wrote: On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message ... On 03/09/2015 23:54, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote Here it is again, in case he's forgotton All the evidence by the knowledgeable bodies mentioned; The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL, Sustrans and many other august bodies all strongly recommend bicycle helmets. Why are you arrogant (and stupid) enough to disagree with people who are far more knowledgeable than you? You haven't answered the question I put to you earlier. Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject? Are you retarded in some way? Has anal reflexology damaged your brain? You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Do you still get an erection when you're angry? You have a penis fixation. Excuse him. He will be drugged up out of his mind at this time. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Actually, looking at your question again - "You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?" What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers to type the question? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
TMS320. Care in the community clearly not working.
On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Actually, looking at your question again - "You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?" What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers to type the question? That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head trauma. For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its prevention? RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website, all of which conclude cyclists should wear helmets. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
David Lang can't answer his own questions.
"David Lang" wrote in message On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Actually, looking at your question again - "You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?" What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers to type the question? That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head trauma. That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't answer. For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its prevention? I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this remit and misusing taxpayer money. If they are doing such research, and giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless. Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not change the matter. RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website... ....which you haven't read. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
David Lang can't answer his own questions.
On 04/09/2015 22:53, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Actually, looking at your question again - "You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?" What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers to type the question? That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head trauma. That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't answer. Try that again in English. I did ask a question and I didn't get an answer. Do you have a point? For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its prevention? I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this remit and misusing taxpayer money. The Ambulance Service spend a lot of time doing research like this. It makes them more efficient. If they are doing such research, and giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless. It is available. But not to moronic cyclists. Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not change the matter. When I describe you as a retard it isn't an insult, it's a factual description. RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website... ...which you haven't read. I have - you haven't. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
David Lang can't answer his own questions.
"David Lang" wrote in message ... On 04/09/2015 22:53, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote: "David Lang" wrote in message You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS, the Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL & Sustrans are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma?? My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of mopping up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so. That confirms it. You are retarded. Actually, looking at your question again - "You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?" What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your fingers to type the question? That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head trauma. That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't answer. Try that again in English. I did ask a question and I didn't get an answer. You asked a question. You wanted an anser to "You seriously doubt that..?", which would be "yes" or "no". Which were you looking for? Do you have a point? You've spent lots of time flogging this to death. You seem to think you have a point and the process is to tease out what it might be. Except you just keep repeating something about the ambulance service. For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its prevention? I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this remit and misusing taxpayer money. The Ambulance Service spend a lot of time doing research like this. It makes them more efficient. Then you or they (most likely you) don't understand their function. If they are doing such research, and giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless. It is available. But not to moronic cyclists. Try me. Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not change the matter. When I describe you as a retard it isn't an insult, it's a factual description. RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website... ...which you haven't read. I have - ....then failed to understand. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
TMS320 completely Dagenham.
I have no idea what he is on about now. It appears to be a gibbering
rant, but I have no idea what he is saying anymore. Can anyone help? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jester still can't answer simple question. | David Lang | UK | 2 | September 2nd 15 09:00 AM |
Jester still unable to answer simple question | David Lang | UK | 3 | September 1st 15 09:17 PM |
Jester unable to answer another simple question | David Lang | UK | 3 | August 30th 15 11:19 PM |
Jester unable or unwilling to answer simple question. | David Lang | UK | 14 | August 30th 15 12:25 AM |