A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Add vice, please



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 29th 07, 09:04 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Just zis Guy, you know?
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,612
Default Add vice, please

What ho, gentlefolks. I am moving my website content form Lotus
Domino, which I used because I was a Domino developer, to Mediawiki
software, to make it easier to update. I have a couple of technical
issues with Mediawiki but the most pressing problem I have now is
this:

For pages which are not yet ported from the old site, which is most
of them, should I do this:

http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/Advocacy

or this:

http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/CageGlass

See the difference? One is a template saying look here for the old
content, the other is a search page. I can't make up my mind, and
I'm trying to make some new content as I do the work, as well as
updating things, so it will not be a five minute job. The "not done
yet" list is likely to be quite long for a while.

Alternatively, should I simply leave the old site online until I've
done it all?

Thanks for any suggestions,

Guy
--
May contain traces of irony. Contents liable to settle after posting.
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk

85% of helmet statistics are made up, 69% of them at CHS, Puget Sound
Ads
  #2  
Old July 29th 07, 10:01 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Nick Kew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 268
Default Add vice, please

On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:04:37 +0100
"Just zis Guy, you know?" wrote:

What ho, gentlefolks. I am moving my website content form Lotus
Domino, which I used because I was a Domino developer, to Mediawiki
software, to make it easier to update. I have a couple of technical
issues with Mediawiki but the most pressing problem I have now is
this:

For pages which are not yet ported from the old site, which is most
of them,


Set a 404 ErrorDocument that either redirects to the old versions
or reverse-proxies them onto the new site. You're using Apache,
so that's straightforward enough, even on windoze.

--
not me guv
  #3  
Old July 30th 07, 12:18 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Andrew Chadwick
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default Add vice, please

On 2007-07-29 20:04 +0000, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:

See the difference? One is a template saying look here for the old
content, the other is a search page. I can't make up my mind, and
I'm trying to make some new content as I do the work, as well as
updating things, so it will not be a five minute job. The "not done
yet" list is likely to be quite long for a while.

Alternatively, should I simply leave the old site online until I've
done it all?


If you can generate a list of the WikiNames from the old site with a Bit
of Perl, you could shove the definitions into an easily-managable
..htaccess or Include file and throw 302 Found responses back at the user
for just a specific, listed set of pages.

Home and the rest of the buttons on the old site should probably direct
the user to the equivalent page on the new :80 site. If Domino can't be
made to do that, and/or it generates redirects in terms of itself,
Nick's reverse proxy idea is probably better. ProxyPassReverse is your
friend.

If you do the reverse-proxy trick, you can hide the old server on an
RFC1918 URI.

For ease of maintenance, I still suggest maintaining the list as a
single, separate text file using Include.

--
Andrew Chadwick
  #4  
Old July 30th 07, 11:05 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mark[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 155
Default Add vice, please

For pages which are not yet ported from the old site, which is most
of them, should I do this:

http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/Advocacy

or this:

http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/wiki/CageGlass


We're either presented with a link to the exact information we wanted, or
told to feck off and google for it. Is there really a choice to be made
here?
  #5  
Old July 30th 07, 11:38 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Nick Kew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 268
Default Add vice, please

On 30 Jul 2007 10:05:03 GMT
Mark
pleasegivegenerously@warmail*turn_up_the_heat_to_ reply*.com.invalid
wrote:


We're either presented with a link to the exact information we
wanted, or told to feck off and google for it. Is there really a
choice to be made here?


/me suspects you *looked*!

--
not me guv
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
can spd shoes take look cleats & vice versa? Alan Paterson UK 5 April 18th 06 09:33 AM
Life imitates art or vice versa Olebiker General 12 September 30th 05 01:26 AM
FS: Easton Vice stem Carla A-G Marketplace 0 August 19th 05 04:38 PM
Eastom vice stem 65mm, 10 deg Bruce Edge Marketplace 0 June 22nd 05 11:07 PM
Smith Vice Sunglasses [email protected] Marketplace 0 January 31st 05 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.