|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? The technique amounts to self-centred abuse of other road-users no matter who does it or how they do it. It's totally unnecessary and undesirable. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 11/08/2015 10:21, JNugent wrote:
On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? The technique amounts to self-centred abuse of other road-users no matter who does it or how they do it. It's totally unnecessary and undesirable. Then don't do it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 11/08/2015 10:25, Bod wrote:
On 11/08/2015 10:21, JNugent wrote: On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? The technique amounts to self-centred abuse of other road-users no matter who does it or how they do it. It's totally unnecessary and undesirable. Then don't do it. It ought to have been clear - even to you - that I would never do it. But obviously, not everyone is capable of correct inference and comprehension when reading. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
"JNugent" wrote
On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. The technique amounts to self-centred abuse of other road-users no matter who does it or how they do it. It's totally unnecessary and undesirable. It can be. But I was responding to your nonsense about drivers trying to have a side by side chat. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On Wednesday, 12 August 2015 01:17:31 UTC+1, TMS320 wrote:
But I was responding to your nonsense about drivers trying to have a side by side chat. Looks like these killers were having a side by side chat while racing together. It's been "living hell" for the killer though apparently. http://www.getreading.co.uk/news/rea...ersham-9836570 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 12/08/2015 01:17, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. Correct and correct. It is just as I said. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. And? The technique amounts to self-centred abuse of other road-users no matter who does it or how they do it. It's totally unnecessary and undesirable. It can be. But I was responding to your nonsense about drivers trying to have a side by side chat. They could try. Or they could just use some other excuse for obstructing the highway. Cyclists have a million of 'em. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
"JNugent" wrote On 12/08/2015 01:17, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. Correct and correct. It is just as I said. Apart from failing to realise until it was pointed out to you. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. And? If the implication is not obvious to you, it is more evidence that you are not of this world. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 12/08/2015 20:24, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote On 12/08/2015 01:17, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. Correct and correct. It is just as I said. Apart from failing to realise until it was pointed out to you. Don't be so stupid. All you did was repeat what I said. What about the question? But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. And? If the implication is not obvious to you, it is more evidence that you are not of this world. What was your "point"? What does the fact that a head-on collision is usually worse than a rear-end collision got to do with the topic? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
"JNugent" wrote in message ... On 12/08/2015 20:24, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 12/08/2015 01:17, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. Correct and correct. It is just as I said. Apart from failing to realise until it was pointed out to you. Don't be so stupid. Are there any mirrors in your house? All you did was repeat what I said. What about the question? But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. And? If the implication is not obvious to you, it is more evidence that you are not of this world. What was your "point"? What was yours? What does the fact that a head-on collision is usually worse than a rear-end collision got to do with the topic? Where did rear end collisions come from? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
| --------SPACE--------|
On 12/08/2015 21:01, TMS320 wrote:
"JNugent" wrote: On 12/08/2015 20:24, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 12/08/2015 01:17, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote On 10/08/2015 21:25, TMS320 wrote: "JNugent" wrote What would you say if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast? Lorry drivers seem to do it fairly regularly on motorways and dual carriageways... Not with the whole-hearted approval of other drivers. You put the words "would" and "if" in your sentence. The scenerio happens and you know what people think about it. Correct and correct. It is just as I said. Apart from failing to realise until it was pointed out to you. Don't be so stupid. Are there any mirrors in your house? All you did was repeat what I said. What about the question? You are not going to be drawn on what your reaction would be if two motor vehicle drivers, keen to conduct a conversation (and as entitled as anyone else to do so) drove two abreast, are you? And that's odd, since you seem happy with the situation when two much slower vehicles obstruct the road in that manner. But otherwise, please tell us your technique of fitting two motor vehicles side by side in a single lane. What have lanes to do with it? Crashes involving motor vehicles rarely make the headlines but head on collisions are sometimes newsworthy. And? If the implication is not obvious to you, it is more evidence that you are not of this world. What was your "point"? What was yours? Mine was that cyclists should not obstruct the road in any way which is unnecessary to the making of progress whilst displaying due care and attention and due consideration for other road users (as, indeed, neither should anyone else). Yours was....? What does the fact that a head-on collision is usually worse than a rear-end collision got to do with the topic? Where did rear end collisions come from? You introduced an extraneous "point" to the effect that "head on collisions" are "worse". You must have had some comparator type of collision in mind. But perhaps I was expecting too much logic from you. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclists Get More Space | Bret Cahill[_3_] | UK | 1 | November 2nd 12 05:15 PM |
Space Legs? | dave a | Racing | 15 | February 26th 09 04:33 AM |
Unicycling, as seen from space | mcnuggets300 | Unicycling | 10 | November 22nd 07 02:57 AM |
Cyclists in Space! | Tony Raven | UK | 4 | September 6th 06 11:34 AM |
Keeping fit in space.. | dtmeister | Australia | 0 | June 30th 06 08:25 AM |