Lance Doping History

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/L...Doping-History

Thanks,

Magilla

On Nov 22, 8:22*am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/L...Doping-History

Thanks,

Magilla

gotta love their conclusions that perhaps we should shift our
interests to women's cycling since they are essentially drug free.
Right.

On Nov 22, 10:38*am, Scott wrote:
On Nov 22, 8:22*am, MagillaGorilla wrote:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/L...Doping-History

Thanks,

Magilla

gotta love their conclusions that perhaps we should shift our
interests to women's cycling since they are essentially drug free.
Right.

Yes, let's now focus on ... Liz.

Even though any informed person can be certain Lance doped the cheesy
use of the 'negative' images and the repetition of 'villian' hurt the
credibility of the piece. This won't change anyone's mind.

MagillaGorilla wrote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/L...Doping-History

What a horrible interface. Is it the same as
http://cyclingintro2.webs.com/CyclingIntro6.pdf (6.1 MB)? As found on
http://twitter.com/nyvelocity/status/5711489666

Anton Berlin wrote:
Even though any informed person can be certain Lance doped the cheesy
use of the 'negative' images and the repetition of 'villian' hurt the
credibility of the piece. This won't change anyone's mind.

Outstanding observation.

Writing like this has done for the anti-doping crowd what Sarah Palin is
doing for the G.O.P.

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:23:49 -0800 (PST), Anton Berlin
wrote:

Even though any informed person can be certain Lance doped the cheesy
use of the 'negative' images and the repetition of 'villian' hurt the
credibility of the piece. This won't change anyone's mind.

They set up the test. 'You pass this and we certify you as clean', no?

He passed. End of story.

On Nov 22, 8:22*am, MagillaGorilla wrote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16226502/L...Doping-History

Thanks,

Magilla

Who wrote that screed?

Brad Anders

On Nov 22, 9:47*am, Fred Fredburger
wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote:
Even though any informed person can be certain Lance doped the cheesy
use of the 'negative' images and the repetition of 'villian' hurt the
credibility of the piece. *This won't change anyone's mind.

Outstanding observation.

Writing like this has done for the anti-doping crowd what Sarah Palin is
doing for the G.O.P.



Dumbass -

If she runs for Prez and gets nominated, that plays right into the
Dems' hands.

She's too polarizing (and uninformed). They'll lose the entire
moderate/independent/intellectual voting segment of the country. Even
the intellectual conservatives won't go for her, they probably just
won't vote.

The Dumbass Idiot Conservatives, they love her. They'll be the ones
who might be able to get her nominated, to the sure defeat of their
party.

thanks,

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. wrote:
On Nov 22, 9:47 am, Fred Fredburger
wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote:
Even though any informed person can be certain Lance doped the cheesy
use of the 'negative' images and the repetition of 'villian' hurt the
credibility of the piece. This won't change anyone's mind.
Outstanding observation.

Writing like this has done for the anti-doping crowd what Sarah Palin is
doing for the G.O.P.



Dumbass -

If she runs for Prez and gets nominated, that plays right into the
Dems' hands.

She's too polarizing (and uninformed). They'll lose the entire
moderate/independent/intellectual voting segment of the country. Even
the intellectual conservatives won't go for her, they probably just
won't vote.

The Dumbass Idiot Conservatives, they love her. They'll be the ones
who might be able to get her nominated, to the sure defeat of their
party.

thanks,

Kurgan. presented by Gringioni.

Palin/Beck in 2012!