|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
Terryc wrote:
Majority rules 'Everyone' is a pedestrian 'Everyone' is a car driver Really? Based on bicycle sales verses car sales, the more correct statement is "Everyone is a bicycle rider". You forgot the bit about "80% of families with bicycles only take said bicycles out twice per year". So it may be more correct to say that 'everyone is more likely to walk than bicycle, and more likely to car than walk'. -- Linux Registered User # 302622 http://counter.li.org |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
John Tserkezis Wrote: You forgot the bit about "80% of families with bicycles only take said bicycles out twice per year". So it may be more correct to say that 'everyone is more likely to walk than bicycle, and more likely to car than walk'. Where's the citable references for those quotes? -- cfsmtb |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
Bleve wrote:
John Tserkezis wrote: Australian drivers are not headed for a troublesome future, because nothing will change. They won't even realise they're killing themselves, because GovCo has over umpteen years conditioned them to think that speeding alone is the only one reason that anyone dies on the roads. Their wallets will force them off the road soon enough. Things *are* changing. http://www.aboc.com.au/Members/carl/...PriceTrend.gif Nice graph. So how many people were f'orced off the road' in 1979, when the price of crude went up 170% in six months? People who don't smoke think that when the price of a packet of fags gets to $10 people will stop smoking. It passed that point some time ago and people still smoke. A lot of people spend more on tobacco than on petrol, and let's not mention beer spending. Theo |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
cfsmtb Wrote: Where's the citable references for those quotes? John Tserkezis usenet:aus.bicycle 2008 :P -- kanangara |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
kanangara Wrote: John Tserkezis usenet:aus.bicycle 2008 :P *boom* *tish* Although I don't think that would be accepted when writing submissions. -- cfsmtb |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
cfsmtb wrote:
Where's the citable references for those quotes? Er, "I read about it on the Internet, so it must be true". True story, it was an (online) SMH article that claimed that. (the 80% bit, not the who rides what bit). -- Linux Registered User # 302622 http://counter.li.org |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
John Tserkezis wrote:
Terryc wrote: Majority rules 'Everyone' is a pedestrian 'Everyone' is a car driver Really? Based on bicycle sales verses car sales, the more correct statement is "Everyone is a bicycle rider". You forgot the bit about "80% of families with bicycles only take said bicycles out twice per year". So it may be more correct to say that 'everyone is more likely to walk than bicycle, and more likely to car than walk'. Your logic is faulty. Perhaps if you bicycled more blood flow to the brain might improve. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
In aus.bicycle on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:00:53 +1100 Terryc wrote: PeteSig wrote: Majority rules 'Everyone' is a pedestrian 'Everyone' is a car driver Really? Based on bicycle sales verses car sales, the more correct statement is "Everyone is a bicycle rider". No. "Everyone is a bicycle buyer". You can't deduce more than that. So the same applies to car? If not, why not? |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
John Tserkezis wrote:
cfsmtb wrote: Where's the citable references for those quotes? Er, "I read about it on the Internet, so it must be true". True story, it was an (online) SMH article that claimed that. (the 80% bit, not the who rides what bit). Well at least the SMH is marginally more readable than the Terror or the Heretic or the ague or whatever, but 99% of their column inches reads like arse pluck anyway. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Cadel on Australian drivers
In aus.bicycle on Wed, 09 Jan 2008 11:28:02 +1100
Terryc wrote: Zebee Johnstone wrote: No. "Everyone is a bicycle buyer". You can't deduce more than that. So the same applies to car? If not, why not? Of course it does. If all you know is "X cars sold" then that's all you know. You don't know how many trips are made, how many people travel in them, or how many km are covered. You can, of course, get more information. Such as number of cars seen on the road, number of places selling 2nd hand ones, number of repair shops, amount of petrol sold and all that. But if all you know is number sold, that's all you know. Zebee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cadel Evans Australian? | Andy | Racing | 19 | July 31st 07 03:56 PM |
Cadel Evans Australian? | Andy | Australia | 24 | July 31st 07 03:56 PM |
Go, Go, Go Cadel!!!!! | Patrick Turner | Australia | 6 | July 29th 07 06:49 AM |
Go Cadel! | Steve | Australia | 32 | May 3rd 06 04:24 AM |
Cadel Evans | David Ferguson | Racing | 0 | July 22nd 05 03:14 AM |