|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Which Brakes? Avid Mechanical Disc? Magura Big or Marta HydraulicDisc?
David Damerell wrote:
I think I've already answered that one, just above. What you've done is come up with a precious excuse for not actually letting on whether you know what you're talking about from experience or just from theory (guesswork, in other words, even if educated guesswork). No matter how much or how little experience I have, your guesswork remains guesswork. I specifically pointed out I didn't know what experience you actually had, and asked for clarification. Which you rather pathetically persist in avoiding giving. If someone is reading the thread wanting advice it is to their advantage if the basis of any advice they get is known. So why not just stop with the precious justifications of not actually saying whether your opinions are based on experience or just theory, and let people know? Do you actually want to provide useful information, or just pour scorn on people? Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
Ads |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Brake dancing [was: Which Brakes? ... ]
Jon wrote:
"Roger Merriman" wrote Jon wrote: [ points 1-3] Great! There seems to be some level of implicit agreement on most points. yup. 4) the weight distribution downhill cannot be "further back" than it would be with the same rider position on flat ground, hence the maximum possible deceleration rate downhill is lower than on flat. not entirely get your hanging off the back you can make the bike tip up, ie endo. Do you mean raising the front wheel by shifting weight back? Obviously this would dramatically reduce front wheel braking effect! %^) quite the point being that you can achive a fairly radical weight shift. if needed. Equally obviously, this point of "wheelie" moves further back under deceleration. And the fact that you can move further back on a slope before the point of front wheel lift illustrates that there's less "room left to move" to counter decleration forces on a slope. That is, the point of equalibrium starts further back on a slope. (For some slopes, there may be enough "leeway" to correct to deceleration *and* slope, but at no point can you obtain a greater effective weight shift on a slope than on the flat. Proof is by simple trigonometry.) true, that is less room to move, though in pratice even a very steep road you can get enought weight to prevent endo. off road some slopes are steep enought you probably can't but thats a mute point as attempting to brake would probably be foolish. [...] Cars can stop at much higher deceleration rates than bicycles. yes though worth noting they to suffer from weight transfure, even with sporty set ups the rear's will unweight a fair bit under hard braking. Exactly. And the effect for cars is a tendency for the rear to pass the front by rotating horizonatally (a sideways endo). yes can be done though mostly just a slide forward locking the brakes. Here's a few excerpts from the posting by someone who seems to have a lot of practical experience in braking and cites references: George Hall wrote: Cars and motorcycles can decelerate at a max rate of about 0.7 - 0.9g. ... If you only consider the coefficient of friction of tire rubber on common pavement surfaces, you would determine that about 0.7 - 0.8g of braking is possible for a cyclist. [for cyclists, a] practical limit of about 0.45 - 0.50g is all that most folks will achieve before they experience rear wheel liftoff. [...] caliper brakes, cantilver brakes, V-brakes, or disc brakes - all of these in normal circumstances can produce a deceleration of 0.45g - 0.50g [...] [...] Of course, there are a lot of other considerations for your individual circumstances and preferences, I'm only discussing this from the perspective of braking ability. http://search.bikelist.org/getmsg.as...10709.0118.eml So points that disk brakes are better for some conditions, that they feel better, are more responsive, or are easier to maintain, or sexier, etc.. may all be good reasons for some to chose them! Or not sufficient reasons for others... YMMV Disk brakes do complicate some things, for instance, rear rack mounting for loading touring upright bikes. Jon roger -- www.rogermerriman.com |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Which Brakes? Avid Mechanical Disc? Magura Big or Marta Hydraulic Disc?
David Damerell wrote:
Quoting Roger Merriman : David Damerell wrote: Quoting Roger Merriman : can you ladien the paniers so that on the flat with you on the bike, the bike is at the tipping point? That's just fore-aft position of centre of gravity; height of centre of gravity also affects maximum braking. on a bike with out paniers you can get low and rear Maybe you can; but lifting the front wheel doesn't measure "low", just "rear". the point is the endo, if heavy braking will cause a bike to endo, i'm pointing out it's possible (upto a point) to counter. bike, you can make a lot of diffenance, you are far and away the heaviest thing paniers even heavy loaded ones are light in comparison and have less effect. But - as mentioned to you about a million times now - although they are lighter (but not far and away lighter if heavily laden) - they can be further from the CoG of the unladen normal-position system. i didn't think the rear rack would take anything like 80KG? most seem to 20/30KG range. which is a long way from even a light person. it would be a very bad idea to shift one's weight that far as you can make the bike tip up. Not under heavy braking! no but it does show that you can move a lot of weight about. Which is not being disputed. You've lost track of the point in your semiliterate gibberish. one it is you are disputing at least in your belief that strong brakes don't matter you'll endo before there any use on a solo. roger -- www.rogermerriman.com |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Which Brakes? Avid Mechanical Disc? Magura Big or Marta Hydraulic Disc?
Quoting Roger Merriman :
David Damerell wrote: Maybe you can; but lifting the front wheel doesn't measure "low", just "rear". the point is the endo, if heavy braking will cause a bike to endo, i'm pointing out it's possible (upto a point) to counter. Thank you, Captain Obvious! Perhaps you would like to tell me fire is hot next? But - as mentioned to you about a million times now - although they are lighter (but not far and away lighter if heavily laden) - they can be further from the CoG of the unladen normal-position system. i didn't think the rear rack would take anything like 80KG? most seem to 20/30KG range. which is a long way from even a light person. Mine's a Tortec Expedition steel, which is rated to 45kg, and yes, I fill them full of heavy stuff sometimes. Given that the panniers are also lower than anyone's getting with bottom contortions, and bottom contortions don't move your full weight the full distance the bottom moves... one it is you are disputing at least in your belief that strong brakes don't matter you'll endo before there any use on a solo. Try again in English. -- David Damerell flcl? Today is Stilday, August - a weekend. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which Brakes? Avid Mechanical Disc? Magura Big or Marta HydraulicDisc? | Artemisia | General | 181 | September 11th 07 04:48 PM |
Which Brakes? Avid Mechanical Disc? Magura Big or Marta HydraulicDisc? | Artemisia | UK | 184 | September 11th 07 04:48 PM |
Can I use my Road Bike STI levers with my AVID mechanical Disc Brakes? | Me | Mountain Biking | 6 | July 31st 04 05:15 PM |
Which hydraulic brakes to get? Juicy 7, Hope Mini, Magura Marta (SL or reg)? | The Muncher | Mountain Biking | 10 | September 27th 03 02:03 PM |
Avid mechanical road disc brakes | Eric | Techniques | 4 | August 11th 03 11:55 AM |