|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about
some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three issues resolved before the AGM. (I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On 16 jan, 16:40, Judith wrote:
As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned *about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. *However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three *issues resolved before the AGM. *(I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. *Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. *They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) This is very acceptable cycling news: on the strength of your posting I have just exercised a call option on BP shares and am looking for a put option for after the AGM. Could you perhaps post a scan of the reply you have received? Thanx! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On 16/01/2012 15:40, Judith wrote:
As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. You were going to sell me a few shares Judith, don't forget. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three issues resolved before the AGM. (I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 10:18:04 -0800 (PST), Telegram Spam
wrote: On 16 jan, 16:40, Judith wrote: As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned *about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. *However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three *issues resolved before the AGM. *(I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. *Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. *They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) This is very acceptable cycling news: on the strength of your posting I have just exercised a call option on BP shares and am looking for a put option for after the AGM. Could you perhaps post a scan of the reply you have received? Thanx! Certainly I will post it to you - do you want to email me your name and address. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:20:29 +0000, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote: On 16/01/2012 15:40, Judith wrote: As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. You were going to sell me a few shares Judith, don't forget. Yep no sweat - keep that day in April free then. However - it looks like Porky Chapman won't now be having his ****-up - a bit of a bummer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:33:38 +0000, Judith wrote:
Porky Jawlessness is the primitive state for fish however, and so any such group based on a lack of jaws is paraphyletic. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
"Judith" wrote in message
... As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three issues resolved before the AGM. (I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) ================================================== === Well done Judith. I might join you for a drink after the meeting in April. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On 16/01/2012 22:25, Mr. Benn wrote:
"Judith" wrote in message ... As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. I wrote a letter (as a shareholder - quoting my certificate numbers) to raise some points. I have just had a response. They say that they are addressing all of my concerns ie some are ongoing. I gave them five specific questions which I wanted to ask at the AGM. The bad news is that they have rejected three of my questions as they named a particular member of their staff; but they have said that whilst they will thoroughly investigate my concerns - they do not like to mention people by name at AGMs. However, they have put forward two of my questions in to the pot for possible inclusion. They have also said that they expect to get the other three issues resolved before the AGM. (I bet that is why they want me to ask a couple of questions, so that they can say they have addressed previously raised concerns and resolved all outstanding matters; crafty.) For the info' of other shareholders - or members of staff who may be attending, who are reading this - they have confirmed that the AGM will most probably be at the same time as last year - they are looking at 12 April 2012. Perhasp we could meet up and have a drink together - it sounds like it could be quite a good day out. (I told them that someone else had complained previously to BP at Hull - and the complaint had been passed on to the police. They were not impressed at all - and said that they will look in to that as well if the person concerned contacts them) ================================================== === Well done Judith. I might join you for a drink after the meeting in April. Me too. But we better not invite Mason - he would drink the pub dry. -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:40:50 +0000, Judith
wrote: As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. No, that's your view as a deeply unpleasant individual who can't tolerate dissent, not as a BP shareholder. Guy -- Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed to be worth at least what you paid for them. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
BP Chemicals Update
On 17/01/2012 15:14, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote:
wrote: As you may know as a shareholder I am (and others are) very concerned about some of the antics of BP employees which are reported in this group. No, that's your view as a deeply unpleasant individual who can't tolerate dissent, not as a BP shareholder. For very shame, do not dare to speak of failure to tolerate dissent in this newsgroup of all newsgroups. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Europe Tests Established Chemicals on Millions of Animals | TONY_GALL | Unicycling | 0 | February 15th 07 11:27 PM |
Europe Tests Established Chemicals on Millions of Animals | TONY | Racing | 0 | February 15th 07 12:53 AM |
Europe Tests Established Chemicals on Millions of Animals | TONY_GALL | Techniques | 0 | February 14th 07 06:56 PM |
Europe Tests Established Chemicals on Millions of Animals | TONY_GALL | General | 0 | February 14th 07 06:44 PM |
YUK! A face full of chemicals! | Mike Gayler | UK | 16 | January 15th 04 03:35 PM |