Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

"Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant, bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that cyclists' heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits

--
When shagging a goat you are best taking it to the edge of a cliff because they push back harder. -- Billy Connelly

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
"Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits

get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
"Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits

get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure



I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.


I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
"Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits

get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords of all places for under a hundred quid.

--
The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is its inefficiency -- Eugene McCarthy

On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits


get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

On Sun, 03 May 2015 23:39:48 +0100, JNugent wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits


get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

All you need is two wheels, a couple of brakes, and some gears. You can get one with 24 gears for under a hundred squid. It's not like a car where you can pay more for a more powerful engine, since that is your thighs.

--
"Sir, your daughter says she loves me, she can't live without me, and wants to marry me."
"And you're asking my permission to marry her?"
"No, I'm asking you to make her leave me the hell alone!!"

On 03/05/2015 23:39, JNugent wrote:
On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a
pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits



get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

Mine was only £96 from Halfords. Wife's was even cheaper.

On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:12:03 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 03/05/2015 23:39, JNugent wrote:
On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a
pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits



get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more.."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

Mine was only £96 from Halfords. Wife's was even cheaper.

But does yours have those fancy narrow wheels that cause you to fall off?

--
It's an age-old truism. Men will quickly fall asleep after having sex.
And I know why, too.
It's because they've been up half the night begging for it.

On 04/05/2015 00:19, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:12:03 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 03/05/2015 23:39, JNugent wrote:
On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a
pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits




get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that
cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that
they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

Mine was only £96 from Halfords. Wife's was even cheaper.

But does yours have those fancy narrow wheels that cause you to fall off?

Nah! I wouldn't have one even if you tortured me to have one.

On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:23:11 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 04/05/2015 00:19, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2015 00:12:03 +0100, Bod wrote:

On 03/05/2015 23:39, JNugent wrote:
On 03/05/2015 21:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 03 May 2015 21:38:29 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 03/05/2015 21:00, Mick wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news "Orcutt replied, "Since CO2 is deemed a greenhouse gas and a
pollutant,
bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride." He noted that
cyclists'
heart rate and respiration go up significantly."

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...islator-admits




get a job you psychotic little failure
get a woman you psychotic little failure

I think you annoyed the ickle cyclist Mr Tough Guy.
Please remember that cyclists are sensitive little souls.

I was being funny. Mr Orcutt is clearly an idiot.

I liked this idea though;

"But while Orcutt apologized, he also reiterated his view that
cyclists
should help pay for the infrastructure — bike paths, etc. — that
they're
seeking. To that end, he said he sees merit in Democratic legislators'
"proposed $25.00 tax on the purchase of any bicycle $500.00 or more."

Who the **** pays that for a bike? You can get a good one in Halfords
of all places for under a hundred quid.

Apparently, those ones are not enough of a status symbol (to the few who
recognise them, at any rate) and fail to convey the required message
that cyclists are Considerably Richer Than Yow.

Mine was only £96 from Halfords. Wife's was even cheaper.

But does yours have those fancy narrow wheels that cause you to fall off?

Nah! I wouldn't have one even if you tortured me to have one.

I tried one once, with those stupidly narrow drop handlebars. I fail to see how anyone can stay on them at all. Psycholists obviously don't understand the concept of leverage on wider handlebars.

--
Why is there only one Monopolies Commission?