|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
HOW DANGEROUS IS CYCLING? DEPENDS ON WHICH NUMBERS YOU EMPHASISE.
On 5/14/2019 9:55 PM, James wrote:
snip Certainly the crashes that result in injury seem to have increased significantly more than the increase in participation, however "all crashes" doesn't seem to have changed much at all.Â* Curious. It seems as though the severity of the crashes has increased more than the increase in cyclists.Â* It seems the infra created greater chances of conflict. Exactly. you would not expect the number of crashes to increase linearly with increased traffic, you would expect it to increase at a greater rate. A 75% increase may be worth a few more non-fatal crashes, and the fact that fatal crashes went down also needs to be considered. It's amusing when bicycle infrastructure is put in, cycling rates skyrocket, and someone thinks that this is a bad thing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is cycling dangerous? | Bertie Wooster[_2_] | UK | 20 | March 17th 14 09:43 PM |
Cycling casualties plummet despite rise in numbers | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 7 | April 6th 12 08:06 AM |
"Cycling is not dangerous. Cars are dangerous." | Doug[_3_] | UK | 56 | September 14th 09 05:57 PM |
Help Texas Cycling call these numbers throughout the weekend | Anton Berlin | Racing | 4 | June 25th 09 08:58 PM |
Cycling is dangerous | Garry Jones | General | 375 | November 21st 03 05:52 PM |