A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 16th 19, 07:10 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,979
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.


9/10 people detest psycholists.
Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


Many people detest little doggies.
Ads
  #12  
Old July 16th 19, 07:18 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,979
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote:

Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere
else where such traps are thought to have been laid

Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old
"if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt".

Quite the reverse.

You don't understand plain English words like "boycott".


Yes. It would mean not cycling there.


That's right: not dignifying the area with your presence.

That'll teach 'em.

Won't it?


You're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old
"if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt".

as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic
accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely
innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light.

Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red lights.

Do you think that's funny?


No. How many?


No response. No surprise.

And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference
between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone
else's act.

Riding through a red traffic light and colliding¬* with a vehicle
which is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being
harmed by one's own act".


It is. I never suggested otherwise.


When you answered:

QUOTE:
... cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents [where] they did
something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic
light...
ENDQUOTE

...by raising the prospect of being "harmed by someone else's act", even
though the context was completely focused upon a cyclist being harmed by
the cyclists's own act.


Gosh, the moaning we get from you when anybody else snips, even when it
is no longer relevant.

There's no point trying to explain it to you.
  #13  
Old July 16th 19, 07:40 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,891
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16/07/2019 19:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote:

Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere
else where such traps are thought to have been laid

Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old
"if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt".

Quite the reverse.

You don't understand plain English words like "boycott".

Yes. It would mean not cycling there.


That's right: not dignifying the area with your presence.

That'll teach 'em.

Won't it?


You're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old
"if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt".

as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic
accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely
innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light.

Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red
lights.

Do you think that's funny?

No. How many?


No response. No surprise.


Your stupid question could only be adequately answered with a stupid
response.

I shall not provide it. You probably will.

And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference
between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone
else's act.

Riding through a red traffic light and colliding¬* with a vehicle
which is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being
harmed by one's own act".

It is. I never suggested otherwise.


When you answered:

QUOTE:
... cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents [where] they did
something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic
light...
ENDQUOTE

...by raising the prospect of being "harmed by someone else's act",
even though the context was completely focused upon a cyclist being
harmed by the cyclists's own act.


Gosh, the moaning we get from you when anybody else snips, even when it
is no longer relevant.

There's no point trying to explain it to you.


There's no point in explaining a complaint that has no foundation, if
that's what you meant. And your complaint had no foundation.

  #14  
Old July 16th 19, 08:26 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,595
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.


9/10 people detest psycholists.
Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


Many people detest little doggies.


Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group.
Come along bollock brains, please tell us.


  #15  
Old July 16th 19, 10:45 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Kerr-Mudd,John[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 246
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:26:48 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote:

TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.

9/10 people detest psycholists.


Did you get this figure from a reputable source, such as the Daily Mail?
IMNTK.

Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


Many people detest little doggies.


Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group.
Come along bollock brains, please tell us.

Dog-on-a-string is a constant hazard to cyclists. But we stay up late
worrying about wielders of tyre levers.

PS when has any of your foul-mouthed rants helped cyclists?
WDYPOTAMNG?



--
Bah, and indeed, Humbug.
  #16  
Old July 16th 19, 11:57 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,979
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16/07/2019 19:40, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 19:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote:


as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic
accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely
innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light.

Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red
lights.

Do you think that's funny?

No. How many?


No response. No surprise.


Your stupid question could only be adequately answered with a stupid
response.

I shall not provide it. You probably will.


You raised it so you ought to know.
  #17  
Old July 16th 19, 11:58 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,979
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16/07/2019 20:26, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.

9/10 people detest psycholists.
Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


Many people detest little doggies.


Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group.
Come along bollock brains, please tell us.


Their owners.
  #18  
Old July 17th 19, 09:31 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,378
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16. 7. 2019 18:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote:

Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere
else where such traps are thought to have been laid

Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old
"if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt".

Quite the reverse.

You don't understand plain English words like "boycott".


Yes. It would mean not cycling there.

as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic
accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely
innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light.

Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red
lights.

Do you think that's funny?


No. How many?

And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference
between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone
else's act.

Riding through a red traffic light and colliding with a vehicle which
is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being harmed by
one's own act".


It is. I never suggested otherwise.

Only someone very stupid would claim otherwise.

Go on... you know you're dying to claim that a cyclist killed when
riding through a red light isn't the author of his/her own
misfortune.


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.


9/10 people detest psycholists.
Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


I ride a bike and lead a happy life!
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.
  #19  
Old July 17th 19, 09:33 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,378
Default Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps

On 16. 7. 2019 21:26, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote:


Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about
someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm.

9/10 people detest psycholists.
Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead.


Many people detest little doggies.


Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group.
Come along bollock brains, please tell us.


Thanks greatly for the compliment.
It really is a very great compliment to be called bullock brains by YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

PS. Bullocks have more brains than you.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Threat to Peak District cycling Martyn Bolt UK 3 February 14th 06 02:25 PM
Two days in the Peak District Iain Jones UK 0 October 4th 05 10:11 AM
Hill rides in the Peak District turkeytickler UK 6 November 30th 03 01:02 PM
Another Peak District Route turkeytickler UK 10 November 26th 03 09:50 PM
"cycle paths are dangerous" IanB UK 36 August 12th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2019 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.