A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

So what about his much-vaunted household contents insurance?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old June 25th 19, 11:34 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,399
Default So what about his much-vaunted household contents insurance?

On 25/06/2019 09:58, TMS320 wrote:

On 25/06/2019 01:13, JNugent wrote:

Run out of "witticisms", have you?


The goalposts are about to leave the field entirely.


Thanks for responding so distinctly in the affirmative.
Ads
  #72  
Old June 25th 19, 05:39 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Jester
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,297
Default So what about his much-vaunted household contents insurance?

On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 1:12:08 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 24/06/2019 22:14, Simon Jester wrote:



Once again you are the one who introduced the motor insurance analogy.
Now answer the question about 50:50 faukt,


Ah... I see where you are going wrong.

You are behaving as though both parties each had claims against the
other before the civil court.

But as you would know had you read and understood the reports, they
*didn't*.

Only the pedestrian victim has a claim before the court. Any losses or
injuries allegedly caused to the defendant cyclist are not relevant,
becase he hasn't made a claim.

This had already been explained to you, but you obviously didn't
understand. Do you see it now?

whether you do or not, I shan't be explaining it a third time.


So why did you introduce the motor insurance analogy?




No witty response to that?


Why would I respond to such a childish comment?


You said
"We are repeatedly told that cyclists are always insured via their mum's Prudential payments"
All you have to do is provide evidence to support this claim or admit you are wrong and apologise to the group.


The evidence has been posted. All you need to do is sort through the
1,000+ posts I cited for you.

Let me know when you've read them all.


Did your invisible friend post these invisible cites?
Does your invisible friend know it is up to him to provide the actual cite?

If a solicitor wants the court to take notice of a legal precedent can he tell the Judge "It's in the library"?


  #73  
Old June 25th 19, 08:09 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,668
Default So what about his much-vaunted household contents insurance?

On 25/06/2019 11:34, JNugent wrote:
On 25/06/2019 09:58, TMS320 wrote:
On 25/06/2019 01:13, JNugent wrote:

Run out of "witticisms", have you?


The goalposts are about to leave the field entirely.


Thanks for responding so distinctly in the affirmative.


Don't worry. When you are forced to get an electric car, the lack of
need to deal with develop the skills to deal with wandering pedestrians
for the last 50 years should continue:-

https://www.thedrive.com/tech/24182/...ip-like-noises
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
USEFULL HOUSEHOLD CHEMICALS datakoll Techniques 1 February 19th 13 01:12 AM
Insurance - House, Contents & Bicycles? Craig Australia 2 July 26th 05 01:44 PM
Lance bottle contents...? Jaybee Racing 8 July 13th 05 09:35 PM
CTC Cyclecover vs Contents Insurance PhilO UK 3 July 10th 05 03:23 PM
Pink Bikes (contents may cause nausea) suzyj Australia 6 September 8th 04 09:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.