|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. Many people detest little doggies. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote: Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere else where such traps are thought to have been laid Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old "if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt". Quite the reverse. You don't understand plain English words like "boycott". Yes. It would mean not cycling there. That's right: not dignifying the area with your presence. That'll teach 'em. Won't it? You're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old "if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt". as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light. Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red lights. Do you think that's funny? No. How many? No response. No surprise. And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone else's act. Riding through a red traffic light and collidingÂ* with a vehicle which is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being harmed by one's own act". It is. I never suggested otherwise. When you answered: QUOTE: ... cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents [where] they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light... ENDQUOTE ...by raising the prospect of being "harmed by someone else's act", even though the context was completely focused upon a cyclist being harmed by the cyclists's own act. Gosh, the moaning we get from you when anybody else snips, even when it is no longer relevant. There's no point trying to explain it to you. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16/07/2019 19:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote: Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere else where such traps are thought to have been laid Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old "if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt". Quite the reverse. You don't understand plain English words like "boycott". Yes. It would mean not cycling there. That's right: not dignifying the area with your presence. That'll teach 'em. Won't it? You're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old "if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt". as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light. Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red lights. Do you think that's funny? No. How many? No response. No surprise. Your stupid question could only be adequately answered with a stupid response. I shall not provide it. You probably will. And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone else's act. Riding through a red traffic light and collidingÂ* with a vehicle which is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being harmed by one's own act". It is. I never suggested otherwise. When you answered: QUOTE: ... cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents [where] they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light... ENDQUOTE ...by raising the prospect of being "harmed by someone else's act", even though the context was completely focused upon a cyclist being harmed by the cyclists's own act. Gosh, the moaning we get from you when anybody else snips, even when it is no longer relevant. There's no point trying to explain it to you. There's no point in explaining a complaint that has no foundation, if that's what you meant. And your complaint had no foundation. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
TMS320 wrote:
On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: TMS320 wrote: Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. Many people detest little doggies. Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group. Come along bollock brains, please tell us. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:26:48 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote: TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: TMS320 wrote: Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Did you get this figure from a reputable source, such as the Daily Mail? IMNTK. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. Many people detest little doggies. Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group. Come along bollock brains, please tell us. Dog-on-a-string is a constant hazard to cyclists. But we stay up late worrying about wielders of tyre levers. PS when has any of your foul-mouthed rants helped cyclists? WDYPOTAMNG? -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16/07/2019 19:40, JNugent wrote:
On 16/07/2019 19:18, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 18:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 16:41, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote: as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light. Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red lights. Do you think that's funny? No. How many? No response. No surprise. Your stupid question could only be adequately answered with a stupid response. I shall not provide it. You probably will. You raised it so you ought to know. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16/07/2019 20:26, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: TMS320 wrote: Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. Many people detest little doggies. Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group. Come along bollock brains, please tell us. Their owners. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16. 7. 2019 18:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 13:22, JNugent wrote: On 16/07/2019 08:13, TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 01:58, JNugent wrote: Cyclists clearly ought to boycott the Peak District and everywhere else where such traps are thought to have been laid Again, you're defending the people that lay the traps, with the old "if they didn't cycle there they wouldn't get hurt". Quite the reverse. You don't understand plain English words like "boycott". Yes. It would mean not cycling there. as well as everywhere where cyclists have been killed in traffic accidents which have ocurred when they did something entirely innocent like riding straight through a red traffic light. Perhaps you would enlighten us as to how many get killed by red lights. Do you think that's funny? No. How many? And if any are, you're obviously completely blind to the difference between being harmed by one's own act and being harmed by someone else's act. Riding through a red traffic light and colliding with a vehicle which is passing through the junction lawfully is indeed "being harmed by one's own act". It is. I never suggested otherwise. Only someone very stupid would claim otherwise. Go on... you know you're dying to claim that a cyclist killed when riding through a red light isn't the author of his/her own misfortune. Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. I ride a bike and lead a happy life! And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Peak District cycle paths sabotaged with 'dangerous' traps
On 16. 7. 2019 21:26, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
TMS320 wrote: On 16/07/2019 17:32, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: TMS320 wrote: Then you have already forgotten that the thread started off about someone laying traps. It's unlikely it was to cause self harm. 9/10 people detest psycholists. Squirm all you like, but that is the sad life that you lead. Many people detest little doggies. Tell us what small dogs have got to do with a cycling group. Come along bollock brains, please tell us. Thanks greatly for the compliment. It really is a very great compliment to be called bullock brains by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. PS. Bullocks have more brains than you. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Threat to Peak District cycling | Martyn Bolt | UK | 3 | February 14th 06 01:25 PM |
Two days in the Peak District | Iain Jones | UK | 0 | October 4th 05 10:11 AM |
Hill rides in the Peak District | turkeytickler | UK | 6 | November 30th 03 12:02 PM |
Another Peak District Route | turkeytickler | UK | 10 | November 26th 03 08:50 PM |
"cycle paths are dangerous" | IanB | UK | 36 | August 12th 03 04:00 PM |