|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling
and ending up just a stupid discussion group? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
Tom Kunich wrote:
I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Stupid?! Your stoopid! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
Tom Kunich wrote:
I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Because it's February, the winter olympics are on, and talking about bicycle racing 24/7/365 is the sign of dementia, not fan-dom. Once the drug busts start piling up in the spring, conversation will turn back to cycling. -- Bill Asher |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
On Feb 22, 6:48*pm, "Tom Kunich" wrote:
I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? And we wonder why you never figure out that you don't belong here. -rj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
On Feb 23, 2:30*pm, William Asher wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote: I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Because it's February, the winter olympics are on, and talking about bicycle racing 24/7/365 is the sign of dementia, not fan-dom. * Once the drug busts start piling up in the spring, conversation will turn back to cycling. * -- Bill Asher that does depend on which hemisphere you're from of course |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
"ronaldo_jeremiah" wrote in message
... On Feb 22, 6:48 pm, "Tom Kunich" wrote: I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? And we wonder why you never figure out that you don't belong here. I suppose that was the final "hint". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
On Feb 22, 5:04*pm, "A. Dumas" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote: I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Stupid?! Your stoopid! don't take it personally. we are missing the annual bike restore project photos wainting for ice out. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
In article
, Henry wrote: On Feb 23, 2:30*pm, William Asher wrote: Tom Kunich wrote: I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Because it's February, the winter olympics are on, and talking about bicycle racing 24/7/365 is the sign of dementia, not fan-dom. * Once the drug busts start piling up in the spring, conversation will turn back to cycling. * -- Bill Asher that does depend on which hemisphere you're from of course Your hemisphere sucks! And has its seasons screwed up! Northern Hemisphere yeah, -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
Tom Kunich wrote:
I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Tom, if you did some serious testing and checking the stats of some of these other forums which have been around for a very long time now, you would find they have come a very long ways since they started. Probably no forum has grown so fast as the CN forum, but Road Bike Review forum is pretty decent. The Bike Radar forum isn't too bad but doesn't seem to have grown as well as the new CN forum. Also Cyclingforums.com and Bikeforums.net are pretty good. In fact any of these forums you will find any subject you want in many categories, and a whole host of visitors willing to discuss anything you post in a civil manner. You posts are quite typical of what they post and you would find a big crowd giving good replies. There is a huge bike culture out there and a lot of these guys are really well informed. RBR is incredibly thin now, and I don't know where most of old crew went, facebook or forums, but you should at least try some of those forums before you disregard the idea and remained devoted to rbr. Fine, you have been here 20+ years, but if you can't engage the reasonable discussions you seek, why stay? Try the others, and you can always frequent rbr much less frequently. Why not give them a try, can't hurt! The CN forum has a very nice following, and looks to be the best overall. The numbers indicate it has become very robust in spite of all the problems with the new site. Actually the problems with CN might of worked to their advantage since so many thousands of people flocked there to complain. However, many have said the best thing about CN is their forum. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Cycling Group Without Cycling
"GoneBeforeMyTime" wrote in
: Tom Kunich wrote: I wonder why the group seems to be drifting completely away from bicycling and ending up just a stupid discussion group? Tom, if you did some serious testing and checking the stats of some of these other forums which have been around for a very long time now, you would find they have come a very long ways since they started. Probably no forum has grown so fast as the CN forum, but Road Bike Review forum is pretty decent. The Bike Radar forum isn't too bad but doesn't seem to have grown as well as the new CN forum. Also Cyclingforums.com and Bikeforums.net are pretty good. In fact any of these forums you will find any subject you want in many categories, and a whole host of visitors willing to discuss anything you post in a civil manner. You posts are quite typical of what they post and you would find a big crowd giving good replies. There is a huge bike culture out there and a lot of these guys are really well informed. RBR is incredibly thin now, and I don't know where most of old crew went, facebook or forums, but you should at least try some of those forums before you disregard the idea and remained devoted to rbr. Fine, you have been here 20+ years, but if you can't engage the reasonable discussions you seek, why stay? Try the others, and you can always frequent rbr much less frequently. Why not give them a try, can't hurt! The CN forum has a very nice following, and looks to be the best overall. The numbers indicate it has become very robust in spite of all the problems with the new site. Actually the problems with CN might of worked to their advantage since so many thousands of people flocked there to complain. However, many have said the best thing about CN is their forum. Yeah. Which ones among those have banned Susan Walker for saying one of the moderator was fat? -- Bill Asher |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
L.E. Cycling Prints benefit non-profit Cycling Group | Gary Coles | UK | 2 | April 3rd 05 08:59 PM |
Cycling Art prints benefits non-profit Cycling Group | Gary Coles | Unicycling | 0 | April 3rd 05 08:09 PM |
Building a web site for your cycling group | PokerGuy | General | 0 | March 19th 05 03:46 PM |
South London Cycling Group?? | ok | UK | 10 | January 30th 05 03:08 PM |
Chair of all-party cycling group deselected | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 31 | February 26th 04 12:36 PM |