|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The "Science" on Mountain Biking Impacts
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 08:02:17 -0400, "Daniel Lauring"
wrote: Congrats on adding a coherent argument to the debate. Mikes stuff is so poorly written and argued as to be totally worthless to his side. In my opinion, you implied the real difference in "damage" to the trail, of bikers to hikers, without emphasizing it. Once trails are open to bikers, they tend to get more biker traffic than hiker traffic. This is what really causes the added erosion. I think anyone would be a fool to argue that on a mile per mile comparison a mountain bike causes more erosion than a horse. Having said that, it leads to other questions. 1. Could trails be made to support the added traffic? (say by applying some type of suface material...not concrete or blacktop, but something more natural that would hold down the surface.) 2. Would more trails lead to less erosion due to spreading out the traffic? 3. Would limiting access volume help? (say only allowing so many entries per day...etc.) 4. Should trails be physically closed during wet periods? 5. Should access fees be charged? It would be nice to see a healthy, logical debate. This is an excellent example of the sort of rational debate here which Mikey's approach completely stifles. See his response, utterly reflexive and unreasoning and uncompromising. A data point for you in this area would be to look at the Walden Woods Project here in Massachusetts. This has been rebuilding erosion damage and hardening trails and protecting vegetation around Walden Pond, which is heavily used both by fans of HDT, but as one of the better recreational walks in the area. Very impressive use of high-thought, low-tech trail building techniques to stabilize soil and encourage plant growth. Another few years, it will be visually close to what Henry saw from his cabin, and able to handle the many visitors. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) ------------------------------------------------ at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The "Science" on Mountain Biking Impacts
"Gary S." Idontwantspam@net wrote in message ... Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) No fair, Gary. But the exception always proves the rule! Wouldn't it be funny if you guys could get a constructive debate going in spite of it all? Being driven to the margins must shatter certain personality types!! Kum Ba Ya and all... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | July 16th 04 04:28 AM |
The "Science" on Mountain Biking Impacts | Gary S. | Mountain Biking | 7 | April 24th 04 05:33 PM |
The "Science" on Mountain Biking Impacts | Gary S. | Social Issues | 3 | April 23rd 04 04:51 AM |
Mike Vandeman | qa2 | Mountain Biking | 26 | November 18th 03 12:16 PM |