A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

opinions? - Trek 1000



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 11th 04, 01:05 AM
Dhananjay Adhikari
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000


Hi,

I am looking for an entry level road bike to start in the sport. I looked
at a Trek 1000 and was thinking of buying it. I read some reviews on the
web but was wondering if people on this group have some opinions on it. I
would appreciate it if anyone has other bike suggestions in place of Trek
1000 [$569 at local bike shop] or suggestions on a better place to buy it
from rather than the bike shop.

Thanks,
D
Ads
  #3  
Old February 11th 04, 03:28 AM
Alan Acock
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000

When you buy a new bicycle you are buying a relationship with the bicycle
shop. Check them out in terms of how they treat you and others and who is
doing repair work--a kid with a couple weeks training or an experience
mechanic.

Bikes within a price range are roughly comparable, bicycles vary widely.

Alan Acock
"Dhananjay Adhikari" wrote in message
due.edu...

Hi,

I am looking for an entry level road bike to start in the sport. I looked
at a Trek 1000 and was thinking of buying it. I read some reviews on the
web but was wondering if people on this group have some opinions on it. I
would appreciate it if anyone has other bike suggestions in place of Trek
1000 [$569 at local bike shop] or suggestions on a better place to buy it
from rather than the bike shop.

Thanks,
D



  #4  
Old February 11th 04, 04:23 AM
yuri budilov
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000

I bought Trek 1000, 2004 model, early in January 2004..... i.e. about 5
weeks ago....

Too early to tell as I have only managed to ride about 250 km on it since I
bought it but early signs are pretty good for the money.

I upgraded the tyres to the Michelin Kevlar-lined puncture resistant tyres
but otherwise it is standard Trek 1000. I even managed to fall off (my
fault) and the bike ended up in a better shape than its owner, nothing broke
on either one of us, but I was badly bruised.

But I do hate the standard Trek 1000 pedals (with toe clip straps) so I took
those straps off last week and been riding "bare pedals" instead - and with
better average speed too. I am most likely I will get clip-less pedals for
it soon. I suggest you stay "bare" or better go clip-less. This means buying
shoes and special pedals. On more expensive bikes you might get those
included, I guess..

So do realise you are buying a pretty decent road bike but it is only an
entry level bike. You get what you pay for, in general.

"Dhananjay Adhikari" wrote in message
due.edu...

Hi,

I am looking for an entry level road bike to start in the sport. I looked
at a Trek 1000 and was thinking of buying it. I read some reviews on the
web but was wondering if people on this group have some opinions on it. I
would appreciate it if anyone has other bike suggestions in place of Trek
1000 [$569 at local bike shop] or suggestions on a better place to buy it
from rather than the bike shop.

Thanks,
D



  #5  
Old February 11th 04, 05:33 AM
Eric S. Sande
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000

Attention Dhanjay and Dale, which I thought knew better, no binaries
in this ng. It wastes bandwidth when a simple URL would do, and it
really just isn't done. Thank you very much for your cooperation.

--

_______________________ALL AMIGA IN MY MIND_______________________
------------------"Buddy Holly, the Texas Elvis"------------------
in.edu__________
  #6  
Old February 11th 04, 05:53 AM
Matt O'Toole
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000

Dhananjay Adhikari wrote:

I am looking for an entry level road bike to start in the sport. I
looked at a Trek 1000 and was thinking of buying it. I read some
reviews on the web but was wondering if people on this group have
some opinions on it. I would appreciate it if anyone has other bike
suggestions in place of Trek 1000 [$569 at local bike shop] or
suggestions on a better place to buy it from rather than the bike
shop.


The place you buy it is more important than the bike itself, especially if
you're new to the sport. There are dozens (at least) of bikes virtually
identical to the Trek 1000 -- drop-bar bikes with Shimano Sora -- and they're
all within a few dollars of each other. So find a dealer that will give you the
best fit and post-sale service, a dealer you'll have the best long term
relationship with.

If you've been riding for years, and you know all about bikes, then, and only
then, can you afford to be ruthless about price.

Other than that, Trek has a reputation for the best warranty service in the
industry, so you can't go wrong with a Trek, Lemond, Fisher, or Klein. (They're
all made by Trek).

Matt O.


  #10  
Old February 12th 04, 09:35 PM
Fritz M
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default opinions? - Trek 1000

[Dhananjay Adhikari asked about buying a Trek 1000.]

Dhananjay, I have a Trek 1000 (my commuter) and an older steel frame
with a mix of 105 and Ultegra components, and I've rode bikes with
Tiagra. The Sora group on the 1000 is fine, but you may want to spend
the extra cash to get a bike with a Tiagra group (the next level up
from Sora) if you can.

Shifting on Tiagra is noticably better. Shifting up on the front
chainring especially is extremely clunky with the Sora. The thumb
shifters aren't a problem for me, but some people find them to be
cumbersome.

If you want to upgrade in the future, the 9-speed Tiagra is more
upgradable than the 8-speed Sora. With Sora, you can't do it piecemeal
-- the 8-speed components are not at all compatible with the 9-speed
world.

There's a world of difference in reliability between my (mostly) 105
bike and my Sora-equipped Trek. I don't know how Tiagra would compare
in this department.

These are engineering compromises to keep the cost low rather than
real pitfalls. If the shortcomings aren't that important to you then
Sora will work just fine. Be sure to go for more than a spin in the
parking lot -- work the levers and get the feel for the bike. Keep in
mind that if something is just mildly annoying in your short test
ride, that mild annoyance will be magnified manyfold during a
three-hour ride.

When I test rode my Trek 1000, for example, I noticed the
front-chainring clunkiness but I thought it'll just be a commuter, I
won't be using the front derailer much, and I can compensate. (I have
3 rings, and the small ring helps on steep hills on my commute). I
bike commute about 200 miles/month, and because of that stupid clunky
front derailer I now wish I had gotten a Tiagra equipped bike instead.

RFM
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which frame is built better, new or 20 year old Trek 520? Michael General 4 September 16th 03 03:21 AM
trek 1000 vs cannondale R400 Triple mark watkins General 2 September 12th 03 06:49 PM
Trek 1000 vs. 1000C Preston Crawford General 5 August 12th 03 04:49 AM
HYBRIDS: Gary Fisher / Trek / Cannondale - Your Opinions Please RJRider General 1 July 29th 03 10:33 AM
Info on 1986 Trek 620 Mark Traphagen General 2 July 12th 03 02:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2010 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.