|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 10/07/2019 15:15, Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 12:01:43 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 09/07/2019 23:29, Simon Jester wrote: Define "Right in the head". Any reasonable way you like. 'People' 'born' in Liverpool are not right in the head. You get even more pathetic with every post. You aren't it. Correct, I am human. ....but as you confirm, not right in the head. Remember this is The Real World not Nugentworld and your invisible friends can't vote. See what I mean? Tell us more about these pedestrian zones on motorways. You introduced them. Nonsense. You countered (or attempted to counter) a report of a law-breaking cyclist on a motorway with a tale about a driver in predestrian zones. There are no pedestrian zones on motorways. Either you were claiming that there are or you were being even more irrelevant then usual. Which was it? We could do with a laugh. Exactly, we will all laugh at your attempt to deny your introduction of 'pedestrian zones on motorways' and the way you wriggle and squirm to avoid admitting you are wrong. One should expect you to have much comprehension of logical thought or development of argument. You are, after all, as you have admitted (above), not right in the head. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 1:54:57 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 10/07/2019 15:15, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 12:01:43 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 09/07/2019 23:29, Simon Jester wrote: Define "Right in the head". Any reasonable way you like. 'People' 'born' in Liverpool are not right in the head. You get even more pathetic with every post. Truth hurts. You aren't it. Correct, I am human. ...but as you confirm, not right in the head. Define 'Right in the Head'. Remember this is The Real World not Nugentworld and your invisible friends can't vote. See what I mean? Tell us more about these pedestrian zones on motorways. You introduced them. Nonsense. You countered (or attempted to counter) a report of a law-breaking cyclist on a motorway with a tale about a driver in predestrian zones. There are no pedestrian zones on motorways. Either you were claiming that there are or you were being even more irrelevant then usual. Which was it? You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. We could do with a laugh. Exactly, we will all laugh at your attempt to deny your introduction of 'pedestrian zones on motorways' and the way you wriggle and squirm to avoid admitting you are wrong. One should expect you to have much comprehension of logical thought or development of argument. You are, after all, as you have admitted (above), not right in the head. W5 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 1:54:57 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 10/07/2019 15:15, Simon Jester wrote: On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 12:01:43 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 09/07/2019 23:29, Simon Jester wrote: Define "Right in the head". Any reasonable way you like. 'People' 'born' in Liverpool are not right in the head. You get even more pathetic with every post. Truth hurts. You aren't it. Correct, I am human. ...but as you confirm, not right in the head. Define 'Right in the Head'. Any reasonable you like. It's clearly not a description of you. Remember this is The Real World not Nugentworld and your invisible friends can't vote. See what I mean? Tell us more about these pedestrian zones on motorways. You introduced them. Nonsense. You countered (or attempted to counter) a report of a law-breaking cyclist on a motorway with a tale about a driver in predestrian zones. There are no pedestrian zones on motorways. Either you were claiming that there are or you were being even more irrelevant then usual. Which was it? You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. We could do with a laugh. Exactly, we will all laugh at your attempt to deny your introduction of 'pedestrian zones on motorways' and the way you wriggle and squirm to avoid admitting you are wrong. One should expect you to have much comprehension of logical thought or development of argument. You are, after all, as you have admitted (above), not right in the head. Oops... I missed out a "not" there. W5 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in "pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian zones are on motorways. If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate Jester's mind. That's all. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 11/07/2019 17:43, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote: On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in "pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian zones are on motorways. If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate Jester's mind. Damn... "equivalence". That's all. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote: On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in "pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian zones are on motorways. Where did I try to justify their actions? If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate Jester's mind. Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'. A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it. That's all. Folks! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On 11/07/2019 18:31, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote: On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in "pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian zones are on motorways. Where did I try to justify their actions? In a post on this newsgroup. If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate Jester's mind. Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'. You've already agreed that. A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it. Not necessary. You've already agreed it. That's all. Folks! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 2:15:22 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 18:31, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote: On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways. You don't even understand what you are saying. It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours. Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz. The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in "pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian zones are on motorways. Where did I try to justify their actions? In a post on this newsgroup. Then you should have no trouble citing the actual text. If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate Jester's mind. Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'. You've already agreed that. Without a definition I cannot agree or disagree. A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it. Not necessary. You've already agreed it. Where? That's all. Folks! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist gets fined for riding on a motorway
On Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:15:58 GMT, Simon Jester
wrote: On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 2:15:22 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 18:31, Simon Jester wrote: On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote: On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote: On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote: Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'. You've already agreed that. Without a definition I cannot agree or disagree. A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it. Not necessary. You've already agreed it. Where? That's all. Folks! Get a room, you two. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclist with child on tow rides across a motorway | MrCheerful | UK | 2 | March 19th 19 12:31 AM |
Cyclist critically ill after crash on motorway | Mrcheerful | UK | 18 | July 20th 15 09:34 AM |
yet another cyclist on a motorway | Mrcheerful | UK | 14 | March 16th 14 09:06 AM |
Reckless cyclist caught by police on MOTORWAY | Mr Benn[_5_] | UK | 3 | April 6th 12 09:35 AM |
Cyclist Fined for Riding on Road in the UK | petulance | Australia | 11 | August 10th 06 02:04 PM |