|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
Crank comparisons. The story so far... After over a year of riding a 24x3" muni with 150mm cranks, mainly for getting around town and mild muni stuff; I fit my little used 28-er with a fat tyre. The comfort of the new tyre distracts me from the loss of control that comes with 125mm cranks and after a few weeks I find myself quite competent on the 29-er with 125's. So much so that I order some 110's from unicycle.com. The first ride with these I find myself feeling a little unstable and have difficulties on hills, especially downhills. Today I went out for the second time and things were a little improved. However, my impressions are that I'm not percieving any noticable improvement in speed or smoothness and that steepish hills are impossible. I also wonder if any improvement in speed would be offset by the loss on hills and in the extra messing around getting balanced after minor bumps etc. Since this is only the second ride there's a good chance that these problems will dissapear with more practice, I'm aware that I felt much the same way going from 150's to 125's, but now I can definitly appreciate the good points of 125's. I'm in a no lose situation because, as xxxxx pointed out, if I decide to switch back from the 110's to 125's, they're going to feel very controlled. Having read other posts on the subject I suspect I may well switch back, especially as I live in hilly Sheffield and as I like to go off the roads into a bit of mild muni stuff. However I intend to stick with the 110's a while so I can form valid conclusions. Getting back from the ride I decided to take my neglected 24x3 muni out. The difference in the turning circle of my legs after 125/110's was vast, I could ride ok but my thighs were really having to shift. Given the mass of human thighs I now understand why riding a muni involves so much sweat, I reckon as much energy must be used in simply lifting and lowering the knees as goes into forward motion of the uni. On the good side that should make muni riding good for exercise. I also noticed that there had been no saddle soreness on the 29-er, but a noticable amount really early on with the muni- not massive but the start of something that would be a factor in an hours time. It occured to me that the large leg turning circle of the muni may lead to more chaffing than on 28/29-ers with smaller cranks. Half way through I encountered a tricky bit that would be impossible on the 29 and suddenly remembered what the muni was for! The rest of the ride involved bouncing over rough stuff and going up and down really steep hills; I arrived home drenched in sweat. I would like to ask a question of those who've ridden both long and short cranks- do you reckon that shorter cranks are better for saddle comfort given that there is less rubbing of the inner thighs on the saddle? -- onewheeldave - Semi Skilled Unicyclist "He's also been known to indulge in a spot of flame juggling - but it's the Muni that really fires him up." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ onewheeldave's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/874 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
The friction thing has to be lower with short cranks. But other than that, crank length is a relatively minor part of saddle comfort. Danny sounds like he doesn't have a good "spin" on his longer cranks, causing him to bounce up and down. This can be hard to damp out with real long cranks at high speeds. Saddle comfort can be controlled much better with a good pair of shorts, a handle or handlebar, and experimentation to find the type/brand of seat that works best with your own personal... crotch. There is no definitive "most comfortable" seat, because different people like different ones. -- johnfoss - Now riding to work John Foss the Uni-Cyclone www.unicycling.com ________________ "Where's my kids?" -- Amy Drummond "Where's my unicycle?" -- Andy Cotter spoken one right after the other, mostly to themselves, at NAUCC 2003 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ johnfoss's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/832 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
Tadaaaaaaa! Mikefule takes the bait... 125s are 17% shorter than 150s. 110s are 12% shorter than 125s. Thus the step from 125 to 110 is smaller than the step from 150 to 125, so the change should be easier. But 110s nare 27% shorter than 150s, so that's a major difference. Adjust your seat height carefully. At first sight, 110s are 15 mm shorter than 125s, so it would be tempting to raise your seat by 15mm because the pedal is 15mm higher at the bottom of its travel. However, I find there is a general tendency that as cranks get shorter, the amount of seat adjustment decreases. I can't say more except to warn: do not assume that the standard 'leg straight, heel on the pedal at the bottom' is the perfect seat height. The advantages of short cranks are two: When cruising on the flat, you can maintain a higher cadence comfortably. When really going for it, you can hit a higher maximum cadence. The disadvantages are Mounting needs more precision Idling needs more care Stopping is trickier Uphills are harder work Downhills are dodgier. Practice will improve all of these things. I have ridden reasonably challenging off road on a 28 with a skinny tyre and 110s, and a 24 with 102s (or even 89s). But there is no sense in going for the shortest cranks you can manage. You need to get used to the feel of the cranks, and learn to feel 'at home' on the uni. You need to learn the little tricks of timing, and when to fight and when to let the uni have its head. The downhill problem is that the shorter cranks allow the pedals to flick past the point of no return much more easily. I strongly recommend that you persevere with the 110s. On a 28 or 29, they are a fine size for fast smooth riding. 125s for more challenging stuff, possibly. A good handle is worth 10% or more on the length of your cranks. As for seat induced discomfort, I find that shorter cranks encourage a faster cadence, and this seems to translate into a slightly more mobile lower anatomy, so generally, I get less pressure pain. Chafing shouldn't be a problem if you wear the right clothes, and you're not ashamed to adjust your cargo manually. -- Mikefule - Roland Hope School of Unicycling "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." Confucius ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 15:40:18 -0500, onewheeldave
wrote: I would like to ask a question of those who've ridden both long and short cranks- do you reckon that shorter cranks are better for saddle comfort given that there is less rubbing of the inner thighs on the saddle? Thanks for the write-up. I'm onto the same as you. As for the question above: I used to be a victim of rubbing/chafing until I switched to wearing cycling shorts exclusively (on the uni, that is). So now I have no chafing whatsoever, on any crank size. Klaas Bil - Newsgroup Addict -- I go a sort of ok speed on my Coker... - Roger Davies |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
Mikefule wrote: *... Adjust your seat height carefully. At first sight, 110s are 15 mm shorter than 125s, so it would be tempting to raise your seat by 15mm because the pedal is 15mm higher at the bottom of its travel. However, I find there is a general tendency that as cranks get shorter, the amount of seat adjustment decreases. I can't say more except to warn: do not assume that the standard 'leg straight, heel on the pedal at the bottom' is the perfect seat height. ... * I switched from 150s to 110s a few weeks ago, and after some experimentation I've settled on a seat hight which is actually lower than before. Basically I was impatient with the slowness of the 150s, and had the seat unnaturally high to reduce knee/thigh bounce. In terms of control, for me the key with shorter cranks is patience. With 150+ cranks I can correct most any balance problem in a pedal cycle. With 110s, I sometimes need to solve 70% of the problem in the first cycle and save 30% of it for the next one. The tempation is to take an easy UPD at t=0 rather than risk a harder one at t=2. -- cjd - who dat? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cjd's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/3965 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
anybody ever make a saddle shaped like a donut? that sound like it'd be comfortable -- ubersquish ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ubersquish's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4328 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
ubersquish wrote: *anybody ever make a saddle shaped like a donut? * On what axis? A huge donut shaped saddle with the axis horizontal and parallel to the wheel axle would be comfy for the rider to sit inside. He or she could lean backwards against the inside curve of the donut to relax on the cruising sections. In the case of a forward UPD, or a falling tree branch, the donut shaped saddle would provide good rider protection. On the other hand, the rider wouldn't be able to see where he or she was going. -- Mikefule - Roland Hope School of Unicycling "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." Confucius ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mikefule's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/879 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
on what axis? man, how do you eat -your- donuts? vertical, like those things you sit on after getting butt surgery. except you sit further back on it than that, since it's not your bum that goes over the hole -- ubersquish ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ubersquish's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/4328 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
johnfoss wrote:
The friction thing has to be lower with short cranks. What's a friction thing? Can you please be more specific? But other than that, crank length is a relatively minor part of saddle comfort. Ignoring the "But other than that," part of this sentence: "crank length is a relatively minor part of saddle comfort." Crank length has nothing to do with saddle comfort, except for two things: 1) The upper inner thigh rubs back and front against the seat less with a shorter crank (smaller circular movement of the foot) than with a longer crank (larger circular movement of the foot). 2) Greater force must be applied to the pedals when attached to shorter cranks versus when attached to longer cranks. This force must be subtracted from the rider's weight (force) to get the net weight (force) being applied down on the seat. Seat comfort is related to that fraction of the rider's weight that rests on the seat. The cranks can be easily made short enough to reduce that weight to zero (the rider must apply his full weight on the pedals to ride). Clearly, with very sort cranks, crank length is a _major_ factor (almost only factor) in saddle comfort. Sincerely, Ken Fuchs |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
crank comparisons
The friction thing was indeed the extra thigh rubbing which comes from the extra thigh movement with longer cranks. My opinion is that it is a factor cos most of my saddle pains have been from chaffing rather than pressure ones (which would be affected by your point no. 2) no.2 is interesting, I'd never thought of that. -- onewheeldave - Semi Skilled Unicyclist "He's also been known to indulge in a spot of flame juggling - but it's the Muni that really fires him up." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ onewheeldave's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/874 View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/27423 |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stripped crank arm | Steve | Techniques | 14 | May 21st 04 06:45 PM |
Longer crankarms | Jiyang Chen | Racing | 129 | March 18th 04 12:37 PM |
Pedal came off crank arm while riding | Gordon | Techniques | 16 | September 10th 03 12:50 PM |
Crank square taper hole too large - options? | Phil Holman | Techniques | 12 | July 18th 03 02:10 AM |